|
Development Alternatives
organised a one day Roundtable on "Renewable Energy for
Sustainable Development: Opportunities, Barriers &
Solutions", on August 17, 2001 at the India Habitat Centre,
New Delhi, as a part of the GEP-CCS project of the USAID, being
implemented by The Louis Berger Group Inc. Development
Alternatives is a major partner in this programme. The objective
of the Roundtable was to identify opportunities, barriers and
solutions for large-scale renewable energy development, keeping
in view the environmental and social benefits of the renewable
energy. The deliberations during the roundtable looked at
technical, financing, policy barriers effecting the growth of
this sector and possible solutions to these. The recommendations
when implemented will help all the major stakeholders such as
the Government of India, project developers, financial
institutions, technology providers, NGOs and communities and
will contribute in sustainable development of the country.
Inaugural Session:
 |
In his welcome address Dr.
Ashok Khosla, President, Development Alternatives emphasized
that this roundtable should not be like another business as
usual meetings on renewable energy issues. He mentioned that it
would be useful to discuss ‘what should be done’ by
Government, NGOs,
|
Project Developers & other stakeholders to
accelerate the promotion of renewable energy in India by
removing barriers and finding cost effective solutions to the
issues. He briefed about the framework of the Roundtable and
said that the meeting would be successful if at the end of the
day the participants have identified a definite plan of action
and have worked towards its follow-up.
Mr. Ron Sissem,
Chief of Party, The Louis Berger Group Inc. (LBG), in his
welcome note stressed on the practitioners’ participation to
make the event successful. He mentioned that in the GEP-CCS
project, emphasis is on energy as the key sector for GHG
emission mitigation. The project is aimed at delivering
information and technical assistance to diversify stakeholders’
activity for mitigation of GHG emission.
Mr. Richard Edwards,
Director Energy Environment and Enterprise, USAID in his welcome
remarks stressed on the benefits of the renewable energy to
fulfill the energy requirements of the rural masses, its
contribution in enterprise development & livelihood creation
in rural areas and its contribution in GHG emission reductions
and sustainable development of the country. This would require a
good business model. He also discussed the fundamental issue in
Power Sector and maintained that renewables being decentralized
systems help in rural development. He appreciated Development
Alternatives’ effort in this sector and gave a brief outline
of USAID future focus like promotion of mini/micro-hydel and
biomass based power generation.
Dr. N. H. Ravindranath,
IISC, Bangalore presented the keynote address on ‘Renewable
Energy for Accelerated Rural Development’. He described the
linkages between renewable energy technologies and rural
development, rural energy needs and its features, current
strategies for renewable energy. He also pointed out the
limitations of current approach and institutional issues in
promotion of renewable energy technologies. He further discussed
a case study on a Bio-energy Project in Karnataka, funded by
UNDP-GEF-ICEF-MNES-Govt. of Karnataka, and its contribution in
promotion of renewable energy for total socio-economic
development of the region.
Shri A. K. Mangotra,
Jt. Secretary, MNES, in his inaugural address described the
significant achievements in renewable energy sector in India. He
emphasised on the efforts required to fulfill the gap between
the planned renewable energy development (10% of the total grid
energy) and current status (3% of the total grid energy). In
India 80,000 villages are required to be electrified. He
proposed that electrification in 18,000 villages that are not
accessible should to be done through renewable energy. He
appreciated Development Alternatives’ role in providing an
enabling environment towards promotion of renewable energy in
India for sustainable development. He emphasised the need of
capacity building among different stakeholders in renewable
energy sector and a level playing field. He also talked about
the developments in COP 6- II towards CDM and its impacts on
renewable energy development.
Technical Sessions I:
Identification of Opportunities & Barriers - Stakeholders’
Experiences
The objective of this
session was to identify the opportunities and barriers facing
the renewable energy sector. The session consisted of two
activities – i) a series of presentations by the renewable
practitioners and ii) a working group exercise to identify the
opportunities and barriers. Dr. Khosla introduced the moderators
Mr. S. Patara and Dr. Aditi Haldar, who ware to take care of the
participatory process of identifying the issues and their
solutions.
Dr. Ashok Khosla
brought to the fore a few issues facing the renewable energy
industry in order to set the stage for this session. He talked
about the experience of DESI Power project towards
commercialization of renewable energy. He stressed on commercial
viability of the renewable energy technologies. According to him
the energy policies should have commitment for renewable energy
development e.g. state electricity boards should provide for
third party purchase of power generated. He pointed out that
nothing actually happened on ground till now despite government’s
top priority in rural energy sector. He mentioned that various
subsidies prevailing in energy sector at times result in
decelerating renewable energy development.
Mr. K. Sudhakar,
Director, M/s R R Bioenergy Ltd., presented the experience of
his organization in developing Bio-mass Gassification project
based on IGCC technology. The project has taken into
consideration all possible issues like resource availability,
socio-economic viability etc. He also described the greater
social impact of the project in the area (West Godavari District
of Andhra Pradesh). Despite all the positive factors in the
project he is facing a number of constraints since there is no
capacity available in the country to evaluate the innovations in
the technology. The very innovative technology also poses lack
of confidence among the investors. Issues like constant
devaluation of rupees etc. also pose a challenge.
Mr. Subir Nathak,
Managing Director, Market Dynamics Pvt. Ltd., shared his
experience on mainstreaming renewable energy. The organisation
is active in the Solar PV and Solar thermal sector and is facing
considerable problems as this sector has not really come up with
economically viable technologies compared to conventional energy
and other renewable energy technologies. He referred to the
targeted contribution of renewable energy in total energy
generation. Some of the barriers that his project faced are lack
of infrastructure and training, lack of awareness and old
mind-set of people.
Mr. V. R. Vijaykumar,
Director, Ravi Enteck Ltd, briefed about the activities of his
organisation in renewable energy sector. He discussed about a
5.5 MW biomass gassification project based on PRME gasifier
technology for which the company is looking for a potential
investor. He talked about different opportunities lying in
small, medium & large scale applications of bio-mass like:
rice mill application, poultry litter application, steel, cotton
and sugar mill applications. He expressed that a high potential
of technology adoption is existing in this sector. The barriers
faced by them are in the form of technical validation of the
dual fuel engine system and gas cleaning system. Due to small
size of the project, the cost is also on the higher side. He
also stressed on stable policies by SEBs to encourage more &
more private participation. Reduction of import duty on
technology & equipment is another need of the hour to make
renewable energy viable.
Mr. Ajay Narayanan,
Vice President, Infrastructure Development and Finance Company
gave a brief introduction of his organisation and its activities
in the renewable energy field. He mentioned that India is one of
the largest market for renewable energy applications viz.
co-generation, solar, wind etc. He described briefly the role of
IREDA / MNES in financing renewable energy projects.
International activities like climate change mitigation offer
further opportunities for renewable energy development in the
form of funds like GEF and PCF. On a macro level technology,
finance & policy pose major barriers. There is no
co-ordination between the conventional rural electrification
programmes and decentralised renewable energy development
activities in an area. Not including the environmental &
social costs while pricing leads to price distortions. The role
of the government should be that of the facilitator than it
being the implementor and should encourage more & more
private participation. Lack of capacity in the rural areas and
inaccessibility of fund to the small entrepreneurs is a major
problem. To overcome these barriers, he suggested to emphasise
on reliable technical assessment, proper R & D activities,
financial intermediation by local banks, Government focus on
regulation of service provisions, formation of state level
project development agency etc.
A realistic picture of the barriers faced by project developers
& financial institutions emerged from these presentations.
In order to receive more inputs on opportunities and barriers
the question was put forward to a larger audience through a
participatory exercise. The participants were divided among
various stakeholder groups like
- Project Developers
- Financial Institutions
- Govt. and Public Bodies
- Non-governmental Organizations
&
- International Development
Agencies
The groups
presented the opportunities & barriers as faced by
respective groups. Some of the opportunities as identified by
the participants are:
- Availability of abundant
natural resources
- Large demand in rural areas
which are mostly not connected with the grid
- Sustainable economic
development using local resources
- Appropriate technologies for
socio-economic development of communities
- Growth in ancillary projects
- Employment generation
- Growing innovative and
co-financing schemes
- Mechanisms like CDM, to
provide advanced technologies and funds
- Recent globalisation of the
economy to provide a favourable environment for market based
promotion of RETs
A lot of
opportunities exist for renewable energy development in the
country but despite serious government efforts and inputs,
renewable energy development could not be realised on a
large-scale. The participants shared the barriers faced by their
groups; these could be clubbed into technological, financial and
policy-institutional and social categories. Some of the barriers
are given below, the detailed list is available in Annexure.
Technological barriers
- Lack of established
technologies
- Low conversion efficiency
leading to high costs
- Lack of maintenance, service
qualities and reliability
- Lack of proper documentation
of projects
Financial barriers
- Lack of availability of
sufficient funds
- Difficult access to government
programmes and financing agencies
- Price distortions between
conventional and renewable energy

Policy - Institutional &
Social barriers
- Inconsistent SEB policies
- Intervention of government on
procurement of international funds
- Lack of evaluation mechanism
of new technologies with regulatory authorities
- Lack of good privatisation
policy
- Lack of commitment from
government and developers
- Lack of robust infrastructure
to sustain products, operation and maintenance
- Multiplicity of decision
making agencies in Central, State and Local levels
- Attitude and mindset of people
– no beneficiary participation in planning and designing
Technical
Sessions II :
Recommendations for Promotion of Renewable Energy in India
During this session, the
participants were divided into following working groups on a
random basis :
WG I - Technology
WG II - Finance
WG III - Policy, Institutional & Social – I
WG IV - Policy, Institutional & Social – II
The working groups deliberated among themselves to find the
solutions to the barriers that were identified in the technical
session – I. The solutions identified by the working groups
were presented to the plenary. Annexure contains the detailed
list of solutions. The list being a very exhaustive one, it was
thought appropriate to pick up the most important and the most
urgent ones to develop an action plan for them. The participants
expressed their opinion through a voting exercise on identifying
the issues that should be dealt with immediately. Following
issues emerged as ones requiring immediate attention:
- A Comprehensive National
Renewable Energy Policy
- Availability of Data-base of
Technologies with a Nodal Agency which is easily accessible
- Full-cost Accounting including
environmental & social costs

The participants
discussed among themselves how these issues could be addressed.
The actions required to address these issues and the agencies
taking lead for these were identified. Following Table summarizes
the discussion.
| Issues |
Action
Required |
Responsible
Agencies |
Timeframe |
| A
comprehensive national renewable energy policy |
National
level review and feed back to GOI to improve the coming
policy |
Development
Alternatives to take lead, and the Steering Committee
(P. Jayakumar, Tata BP Solar; Subir Nathak, Market
Dynamics; PD Nair, VATech Escher Wyss Flovel Ltd.; K
Sudhakar, RR Bioenergy; Mamta, IRENET; K Yechuri, AIWC) |
March
2002 |
| Lobbying,
pushing, accelerating the priorities. |
AIWC &
IRENET |
March 2002 |
| Review of Bill
(Long term plan / mechanism to monitor compliance) |
Not defined |
Not defined |
| Availability
of data-base of technologies with a nodal agency which
is easily accessible. |
Content development,
Case studies documentation,
FEEST analysis.
|
IRENET to take lead, Development Alternatives to
coordinate, others to be involved are Dr. Ravindranath,
IISc.; Mr. K Sudhakar, RR Bioenergy; Mr. S. S Garud,
Suryadaya
FICCI’s involvement should also be looked into
|
November
2001 |
|
Full-cost accounting including environmental &
social cost.
|
A new concept – developing this through
institutional, organizational information available,
training may be required to build capacity |
FIs such as IDFC in consultation with TERI &
Development Alternatives |
Not fixed |
The Roundtable
came to the end with the participants expressing their views
about this meet and the closing remarks by Mr. Ron Sissem and
Dr. Ashok Khosla. Ron has expressed his thanks to all the
participants for their effort to make the Roundtable a success
with special gratitude to Development Alternatives for
structuring the whole programme in a realistic way.
Dr. Khosla,
in his concluding remarks congratulated Development Alternatives’
team to make the round table successful and achieve the goal. He
also expressed the need of a proactive contribution by the
organisations & individuals who have committed to
participate in different activities, within specific time frame,
to realise promotion of renewable energy in India.
|