|
To Keep Them Busy and
Make a Living
A report on how Community
Beekeeping can pave the way for livelihoods in villages |
As
the agricultural options dwindle for small and marginal farmers in
Indian villages, there is a growing need for livelihood opportunities
through non-farm activities. Without sustainable livelihood, it is not
conceivable that the disadvantaged villagers can make a decent living.
Schumacher Centre, a development organisation inspired by the thinking
of legendary E F Schumacher seeks “to tackle the roots of poverty” in
rural India and “to promote village livelihoods through use of
appropriate technology and skill building of small farmers, and landless
artisans”.
In pursuing its livelihood objectives, the Centre has been working in
Udham Singh Nagar district in Uttaranchal. Within the district, seven
villages were targeted: it consisted 200 direct women beneficiaries from
the scheduled castes, other backward class and landless artisans all of
whom experienced low levels of income, and poverty.
In addition to beekeeping and honey production, related interventions
like health, human rights education, participation in local governance
and basic education were to benefit as many as 6483 villagers
representing the total population of seven targeted villages. By
enhancing and maintaining a level of livelihood, the Centre aimed at
ensuring that the quality of family and community life in the region is
sustained in the longer term.
Situation Analysis
Although bee keeping appeared an obvious route to livelihood generation
as the targets were located in an agro-forestry area
known to be suitable for honey production, a situation analysis was
conducted to study the living conditions and the prevalent economic
activities in the area. From an extensive situation analysis using
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) techniques it was found that there
were hardly any means of income generation for women villagers apart
from their unpaid or minimal income as a result of participation in
agriculture/livestock activities. The families experienced a high level
of poverty, not only for want of adequate income, but also for poor or
no access to health and education. Out of seven villages, only one
village had access to health services and one village had no school at
all. Five villages had no electricity connection. Women had little or no
formal education and so were predominantly illiterate. Interestingly,
neither government nor voluntary agency were found to be working in the
immediate area, although 10 to 15 kms away, there was a bit of
commercial agricultural activity like rice mills exporting rice outside
the state.
The silver lining, however, was that there was a high level of interest
shown by the potential beneficiaries in participating in the income
generating activities. Also, the target area was suitable for honey
production, forested hills, vegetation and temperature providing
appropriate environment for bee keeping; there was also a tradition of
bee keeping in the area.
The strategies adopted to carry out bee keeping were mainly to
constitute the women into self help groups; training them into
collective action for capital formation for saving and credit and
providing them with appropriate tools like bee hive, bees wax, surplus
bees, training them by an apiarist, providing them with health and human
rights education. The strategies centred over all on supporting honey
production and marketing. Alongside this core activity, there were other
related activities aimed at increasing the self-confidence and
self-image of the beneficiaries, so that they may look forward to a
better quality of life.
The
Activities
The core activity was honey production and rest of the social
mobilisation inputs were built around it. Over all planning and
management of honey production, development of marketing linkages, SHG
savings and loan for investment in honey production, storage and
packaging, provision of equipments and containers for selling, marketing
materials such as labels, flyers on the benefits of honey, market
research, liaison with wholesalers, marketing outlets etc constituted
the activity schedule for honey production.
Almost all the target population lacked a basic understanding of
hygiene, water borne and other diseases, reproductive and child health
care and nutrition. Many children, women and the old were in need of
health care and there was no regular health check ups for the children
in the schools. Lack of basic health education and facilities were
rendering people vulnerable, thereby affecting their livelihood
opportunities. The Centre planned health awareness camps for the target
population, prepared groups of animators who could continue the
sensitisation process through the SHGs.
About 300 children had no access to school or had to walk long distances
to schools in nearby villages. The adults lacked any kind of literacy
or numeracy skills and would benefit greatly from access to such skills
in support of their income generation and savings/loan activities. The
Centre planned to lobby the local government to provide, equip and staff
a school to educate 300 children. It also planned to introduce literacy
and numeracy skills with an e-literacy package, developed for quick
learning by illiterate or semi-literate villagers. More importantly, the
Centre, through its social mobilisation activities, sought to impress
upon the villagers the value of education in relation to participation
in public action as well as for employment generation for children,
school drop outs and adults.
Human rights education is another area, critical for livelihood
creation. Most often people in villages remain poor and deprived for
want of accurate information and inability to access their rights. Of
late, the Right to Information has become a universally accepted
principle of governance, but its exercise or utilisation remains
elusive. This is because villagers are not able to assert their rights.
For instance, the ‘new panchayats’ have acquired enough power and
functions to deliver development in their own areas. But they are still
not effective, as the people do not empower the panchayats by
participating, demanding, urging and checking on the functions of
panchayat officials and representatives. Consequently, the rural elite
dominating the local leadership make panchayats non-participative and an
instrument of their own self-aggrandisement. Although the Centre did not
engage in local governance issues, it sought to mobilize the SHGs to
make them aware of their rights, responsibilities and risks of inaction.
Outcomes
The intervention has befitted the targets in several ways. The
honey production has increased the self employment
opportunities. The honey locally produced from local bees and flowers,
locally processed keeping the enzyme, has retained the nutrient value
intact. The beneficiaries have had increased income, greater collective
bargaining power by working through SHGs and new skills and
technologies. It is relevant here to narrate the initiatives taken by a
woman in entrepreneurial activities
–
it shows how small interventions in skill and knowledge can make a
difference.
Manju Koranga is married with three children. Her husband is a farmer.
Manju was trained in one of the SHG groups, but she decided to do her
own bee keeping as she found 13 members in an SHG shared one bee hive.
Remaining a part of SHG, she bought her own beehive as she realised that
if one had the resources, one could expand the beekeeping much faster
and generate more income. She sold her cow to purchase five beehives of
her own.
She concentrated her efforts on increasing the number of bees within
each hive so that she could extract up to 120 kg of honey in a year. The
apiarist trainer continued to provide necessary inputs to Manju on an
individual basis. She continued to be a member of her SHG as she found
she received many other benefits from the group, benefits of others’
successes and disappointments. With a new source of livelihood, Manju
could dream. She wanted to educate her eldest child, a daughter, who
wanted to do a diploma in engineering. Her two sons were at school and
if they too wanted to go to college, she was confident of supporting
them.
In addition to the increased honey production, which helped the women
save a part of their income and use it for the betterment of their
families, there were other benefits contributing to their quality of
life. They had an improved understanding of health issues as a result of
participation in health camps. They had better access to services as a
result of increased presence of health workers, government health
agencies and medical practitioners in the area. All this, an outcome of
the Centre lobbying with local officials and other government bodies to
meet their legislative requirements to provide primary health care.
With massive social mobilisation in the targeted villages, the
villagers’ self confidence has considerably increased through basic
literacy, participation in the SHGs, awareness of rights and
entitlements, ability to link with government schemes and services
provided, working in collectives. It has been observed that
self-confidence and a development orientation is the key to greater
livelihoods in the villages.
The
Way Forward
A honey processing plant is envisaged to be set up to prevent spoilage
of honey and maintain a natural quality. The processed honey is also
expected to fetch at least three times higher value for the producers.
A sleek, compact easy-to-operate and eco-friendly honey processing unit
is meant to help the innovative entrepreneur to produce high quality
honey by removing impurities, wax, pollens and water. The capacity of
the unit will be 150-200 kg/8 hours shift.
Since there has been prior intervention in these villages and women have
already been trained in beekeeping there is a strong base available to
build on. The introduction of appropriate technology will add value to
the production and income of the beneficiaries. Thus, the particular
intervention has immense potential for replication because community
production, collective action, integrated approach and the use of
appropriate technology will generate local employment and enhance
livelihood generation.
The SHGs
need to be introduced to micro-finance activities. For the sake of
sustainability, micro-enterprise like beekeeping needs to be supported
by micro finance. In collective action, it is easier to generate
financial capital along with social capital. It also makes each member
of the group realise their own potential through a “lead and lag”
approach to the group. The Centre has taken a small but steady step, on
the long road to village livelihood and better quality of life. q
Dr. D K Giri
dkgiri@schumachercenterindia.org
The author is Director of
Schumacher Centre for Development, New Delhi
Back to Contents |