Agenda 2007: Every Village a Knowledge Centre

V. Ranjit Khosla        rkhosla@tarahaat.com


It is in the nature of recent technological revolutions that, following some scientific breakthrough, they take off quickly, get hijacked equally quickly by a small segment of the economy and then slowly filter down to the rest of society. Steel, concrete, air travel, and many other technological advances took decades, if not generations to spread through to the vast majority. The agricultural and industrial revolutions before them took centuries. Information and communication technology (ICT) may just be about to break out of this stereotype. Virtually non existent in the mid-1980s, introduced into the lives of the urban middle class in the mid-1990s, it is now set to enter the remotest villages within this decade!

As a result of a series of studies and meetings starting in May 2004, a large group of organizations have joined together to form a National Alliance with the purpose of making every village a knowledge centre by 2007, the 60th anniversary of India’s independence. Convened by the MS Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) in Chennai, it received strong inputs and endorsement from a wide variety of players ranging from the NASSCOM Foundation to the Ministry of Information Technology, from ITC and Azim Premji Foundation to Microsoft, from the IITs to the IIITs, and from Development Alternatives and TARAhaat to OneWorld South Asia and the National Foundation of India. The 41 founding members of the Alliance, with the active involvement of Dr MS Swaminathan, represent much of the effort now being made to bring the benefits of modern ICT into the lives of the people of our country.

To take the movement forward, the Alliance has set up 7 Task Forces to define the various issues and elements that will be needed to meet its ambitious goals. Development Alternatives was invited to convene the Task Force on Organisation and Management, to design the most effective institutional framework for this purpose. The draft paper prepared for discussion by the Alliance is presented below, in the hope that readers of this Newsletter will help refine it.
 

The villages of India vary widely in their geography, economy, demographics and other attributes. Some are no more than small hamlets, while others can easily be mistaken for a small town. Some are located right next to a national highway; many others are in isolated, remote and inaccessible places. The economy of the Indian village is largely characterized by poor infrastructure; many have no all-weather roads or reliable electricity or telephone connections. A typical village offers very few local job opportunities, especially for its youth, and has virtually no local industry. Facilities for education, social services and entertainment are even more limited. Studies by NCAER and others have shown, however, that there is considerable purchasing power in rural India, though much of it goes into consumption spending since there are few opportunities to invest in off-farm productive capacity.

Any structure and strategy to reach deep into every village throughout the nation must be designed to be able to address this variety and remoteness. For such structures and strategies to be successful, they must be responsive to local needs and aspirations, and therefore highly decentralised. For such structures and strategies to be sustainable, they must in the long run be financially viable, and therefore be designed so as to generate revenue streams that are sufficient to recover the costs of the services they provide.

A key missing link that prevents the village from rapidly developing its human and physical resources, and therefore its economy, is access to knowledge. Not just the formal knowledge normally acquired in schools and colleges but, more particularly, the knowledge its citizens need to create secure livelihoods and lives for themselves and thus contribute to building up the resources and economy of their community. Much of this information exists somewhere, in some form or other, and at some level of applicability and relevance. But to be of value to the villager, it must be accessed, adapted, interpreted, and communicated in a form that he or she can comprehend and put to practical use – at a price that is reasonable.

An example is the setting up of a local industry; say a small cold storage plant. Such an industry can be of enormous value to every farmer in the locality, vastly increasing their potential earnings and reducing their risks for every crop. A villager with entrepreneurial skills wishing to set up such a plant would need large amounts of information … on the business opportunity (a simple business plan), on the kinds of equipment needed and where, how and for how much to procure these, on where to obtain financing, including accessing grants and loans from government schemes, on how to set it up and operate it, how to get assured power and how to market its services … all of which could be obtained through a well designed information system. But even if he or she is armed with all this information, the entrepreneur will still need specialist advice on how actually to set up and operate the plant to make it profitable and successful.

Another example is the need of a farmer to buy a tractor. A well designed knowledge service should be able to help the client get all the information needed in one package, preferably at one (electronic) window. This package should provide, at a glance, the various types of tractors available and their respective advantages and shortcomings, the vendors for each make, the financing sources and their terms, the government subsidies available, the ancillaries available and the additional opportunities for generating income when the tractor is not needed for agricultural operations.

Such information packages and services are not commonly available in rural India. The latest advances in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) offer highly efficient and cost-effective methods for providing them on a nationwide basis. Moreover, if such services are properly designed to take advantage of the economies possible from decentralised delivery systems and multiple revenue streams, they could be provided on a sustainable, commercial footing by private entrepreneurs.

This paper attempts to identify the design criteria for setting up an organizational framework and a system of management that can effectively bring the ICT revolution into "every" Indian village within the 3 year time frame envisaged.

Such an organizational framework will have to be multilevel, decentralised and, in its essence, quick-footed and non-bureaucratic. It will have to adopt the best attributes of the public sector (e.g., attention to universal service provision and scaling up), the private sector (business-like strategies and sense of urgency), academia (innovation, experimentation and rigour of analysis) and civil society (social objectives and direct participation in people’s processes). It will, in fact, have to build active collaboration among the sectors (so-called "public-private" partnerships) to take advantage of the strengths of each and the synergies possible, which happen to be particularly strong in the field of ICT.

And it will have to deal with all the main functional requirements of making "every village a knowledge centre":

l Content generation, updating and localization relevant to needs everywhere
l Access facilities within reach (say walking distance) of every village
l Connectivity of adequate quality in every village
l Fulfillment (including delivery of documents, products and services)
l Capacity building, for itself and all the networks it services
l Financing arrangements to make the other functions possible
l Advocacy to introduce policies for the effective delivery and use of ICT

All of these requirements are critically important. Since steps are being taken to improve connectivity and infrastructure, however, developing content and creating the network of shared access points (IT Kendras) are certainly the ones that now need the most attention on the ground level, while supporting infrastructure for capacity building and access to finance require focus at the institutional level. Special attention needs also to be given to the provision of reliable electricity at affordable prices, which will probably require much greater emphasis on renewable energy sources.

To enable every village to become a knowledge centre on a sustainable basis, several basic pre-requisites have to be in place:

At the village level:

l A common access facility, the village IT Kendra (also known widely as "cyberkiosk", "telecentre", "Internet Café", etc)
l Basic IT equipment (computers, printers, peripherals, modems, etc) for the Kendra
l Connectivity of adequate bandwidth, for accessing the Internet or other servers
l Reliable power sources, either from the National Grid or from local sources, preferably using renewable fuels
l Local knowledge centre clients (users, generators, analysers, interpreters, mavens, etc)
l Management/entrepreneurial skills to operate a village IT Kendra
l Access to "barefoot" consultants to help local users of the IT Kendra interpret and use the information obtained through this facility
At the regional level:
l Network expansion cadres to identify and mobilize village Kendras
l Technical support systems to ensure that the hardware and software at the Village IT Kendras are operating reliably
l Training facilities for IT Kendra owners/managers, staff and network support personnel
l Training facilities for village users
l Mobilising a cadre of local consultants to help village users get maximum value from information services
At the national level:
l Coordination of the nationwide effort and ensuring balanced development of the content, access facilities and other functions
l Standards, policies and procedures
l Mobilising finance, technologies, major partners
l Advocacy of more appropriate policies at the national and state levels

 

The most effective model available in India for achieving the goal of "Every Village a Knowledge Centre" is the "mission-oriented" independent commission such as the Atomic Energy Commission and the Space Commission. Suitably modified, an independent "National ICT Commission" with a limited time mandate, of say five years, could take us a long way towards this goal. The broad structure and functions of such a Commission are shown schematically in the two diagrams above, which also identify the kinds of partnerships and networking arrangements it will have to adopt.

Initial establishment of such a commission will need a collaborative initiative on the part of Government, Private Sector, the Research Community and NGOs. In large measure, the work of the MSSRF and others to put together a National Alliance to this end is already in place to serve this purpose.

Monitoring and Evaluation of the work of the ICT Commission will be much simpler than is required for the usual project based approaches followed in the past. The metrics for tracking the progress are, in the initial stages, quite simple (numbers of users, numbers of villages, and numbers of mini-enterprises set up as a result of the presence of ICT Kendras). As the progress towards the goal of reaching every village builds up, other metrics will need to be introduced, including measures of cost-effectiveness and impact. Many of these methodologies are being developed currently by Development Alternatives in a new approach called Monitoring, Evaluation And Learning (MEAL), which can be shared with the ICT Commission or its equivalent when it is set up. q

Founding Members of the National Alliance for Rural Knowledge Revolution

1. Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Kerala 20 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai
2. Madras Institute of Development Studies 21. Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS)
3. Development Alternatives, New Delhi 22. Indian Tobacco Company, Kolkata
4. Indian Institute of Technology - Madras 23. Microsoft India, New Delhi
5. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics 24. Reliance Infocomm Ltd
6. OneWorld South Asia, New Delhi 25. EID Parry (I) Ltd, Chennai
7. Department of Agriculture, Maharashtra 26. Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University (YCMOU)
8. National Foundation for India 27. Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Government of India
9. Indira Gandhi National Open University 28. National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management
10. Maharashtra Virtual University for Agrarian Prosperity 29. Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai
11. Azim Premji Foundation 30. Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology
12. Indian Space Research Organisation 31. NASSCOM Foundation, New Delhi
13. National Institute of Rural Development, Hyderabad 32. Netaji Subhas Open University (NSOU)
14. Gyan Vani FM Radio 33. Tata Sons Limited, Mumbai
15. National Information Centre (NIC) 34. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore
16. Tamil Nadu Open University (TNOU) 35. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University (BRAOU)
17. Axes Technologies (I) Pvt. Ltd. 36. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center
18. MacArthur Foundation, New Delhi 37. State Bank of India, Mumbai
19. Virtual University on Agriculture Trade, Kerala 28. M S Swaminathan Research Foundation
       


                                                                                                                                             Back to Contents

    Donation Home

Contact Us

About Us