Solid Waste Management -
The Namakkal Experience
Col. V Katju vkatju@devalt.org
The Present Urban
Scenario
T he
Indian Urban Scenario in terms of waste management and disposal
|
 |
|
Waste collection at
Namakkal, Tamil Nadu |
is bleak. Traditional
methods of waste disposal under the purview of municipal and civic
bodies have largely limited themselves to "collect and dispose"
functions which are becoming inadequate to cope with its increasing
quantity and changing nature. Waste has to be treated as wealth and
needs to be viewed scientifically and holistically, recognising its
natural resource roots as well as health impacts. Urban poverty is
inextricably linked with waste. In India, over a million people find
livelihood opportunities in waste collection. Hence, there is an urgent
need to build upon existing systems instead of attempting to replace
them blindly with models from developed countries. Delhi generates 6500
tonnes of garbage per day but only 5000 tonnes reach the sanitary land
fills (garbage dumping sites). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD)
has been actively engaged in devising various schemes for disposal,
treatment and transportation of solid waste but is lagging behind in
achieving a total solution to the problem. Even the judiciary is pulling
them up for non-compliance in providing a status report in the matter by
2 February, 2005 (T01, 14 April 2005). The Delhi High Court had no
hesitation in observing that the capital city has become an
"open-dustbin".
Such a
situation is prevalent not in Delhi alone but in most of the other towns
and cities of the country due to rapid urbanisation and lack of civic
infrastructure to cope with the problem. The municipal authorities are
not entirely culpable for this menace. There is a need to bring about
attitudinal change right from individual households to all stakeholders.
Although change in mindset is not an easy proposition but understanding
one’s responsibility and dedication to make things work would facilitate
clean and healthier surroundings. Initially, strict implementation and
enforcement of environmental laws will pave the way for compliance. We
have to get out of NIMBYS (not in my backyard syndrome) and contribute
as responsible citizens living in a community which respects and
understands nature and environment.
Barriers in
total Urban Waste Management
Non-segregation of waste at
source is a major issue in the chain of waste management. Individual
households have an erroneous notion that garbage disposal is entirely
the job of civic authorities. People, especially housewives, feel it
irksome to segregate wet or bio-degradable waste from non-biodegradable
waste like plastic bottles, glass, cans, wrappings, aluminium foil
sachets, etc. The excuse is that they do not have bins which should be
provided and they do not have time to segregate. A plastic covered bin
and an ordinary cardboard box would suffice. They do not understand that
a few minutes of their time would eliminate hours of sorting out the
accumulated waste. Besides this, such an operation near a municipal dump
(dhalao) by the ragpickers leads to unhygienic conditions, attracting
cattle, dogs, insects and flies. We tend to walk past a dhalao, close
our noses to the terrible stink but do not take time off to reflect as
to what we can do to prevent such a situation.
The
communities or Residents Welfare Associations (RWAs) give a very low
priority to Solid Waste Management (SWM). For them security, water,
lighting, etc. are more important. Although, most localities have parks
within their boundary, somehow the very idea of composting waste at
these locations seems to be an anathema. Those residents who reside near
the parks have violent objection, citing foul smell and general
unhygienic conditions. Ignorance breeds an attitude of resistance
against any initiative. They do not understand that if the place is kept
clean and kitchen waste in pits is covered with dried leaves the
presence of foul smell is eliminated. Those who do understand the value
of composting at source do not volunteer to help in any way and are
content by saying "keep up the good work and we are with you".
Ragpickers,
who are generally migrants in towns and cities, have a large
contribution in waste management. It is a huge unorganised task force
mainly comprising migrants from West Bengal, Assam and Bangladesh. As
they start their work in the early hours of the morning they are looked
upon with suspicion and any theft or trespass in colonies is blamed on
them. The police and security agencies take advantage and extract
whatever available money from them. In Delhi alone there are 1,00,000 to
1,50,000 ragpickers who save MCD Rs. 8 to 9 lakhs daily. At a smaller
scale, in other towns and cities, these ragpickers are contributing
substantially towards clean environment. As quite a few are foreign
nationals and are involved in nefarious activities, they do not wish to
come into the limelight. After collection of waste they do the
segregation in the open, take away the recyclables, leaving the area
dirty. SWM, to be successful, has to integrate them, make full use of
them, thus providing them livelihoods to live with dignity and not as
pariahs of society.
Municipal
Corporations/Munici-palities have the biggest stake in SWM. However,
even with a large force of safai karamcharis they are unable to
carry out their task due to various reasons. In Delhi, as per the
admission of MCD, 30 per cent of the 50,000 workforce are on leave at
any one time. As a result 1500 tonnes of garbage lies uncollected every
day. Most of the safai karamcharis working in localities show up for 3
hours in the morning. They are not accountable to the RWA’s and the
total responsibility of a clean residential area devolves on nobody.
These karamcharis are paid government employees. However, they exploit
the weaker sections of the society by not allowing them to take part in
the management of the waste. They purchase rickshaws and fix up a
door-to-door collection rate of Rs. 30 to 40 per month, making a neat Rs.
6,000/- per month in a locality of 200 residents, They employ a
ragpicker to do the collection work who makes a living by selling
recyclable waste which may be Rs. 50 to 100 a day. If this practice of
sub-letting is banned, three to four women ragpickers can be given this
task, provided proper uniform and given badges of identification. They
would be made responsible for collection and general cleanliness of the
locality 7 days a week, 365 days a year. They will also be responsible
for not allowing any unidentified person coming in the locality. In
addition, they can be trained for vermi-composting which will earn
revenue for the RWA. The Municipal Authorities should also be made
responsible for setting up retail outlets for marketing the compost at a
negotiated price. With the huge savings in manpower, equipment and
transportation, besides earnings through sale of compost, a part of the
municipal budget should be allocated for tree plantation, landscaping,
improving the general cleanliness of slum areas and providing better
amenities like public latrines, proper drainage with soak pits, an
efficient sewage system etc., which are so essential for an eco-city.
Once awareness is created among citizens it will become a second nature
to keep their towns clean, green and healthy.
The Namakkal
Experience
Namakkal is a
small district HQ town of Tamil Nadu, situated on the main highway from
Salem to Dindigul. It is the first municipality in the country involved
in privatisation of all components in SWM. By institutionalisation of
door-to-door collection with segregation at source, manufacturing of
vermi-compost from organic waste and sale of recyclable from inorganic
waste, Namakkal has the distinction of becoming the only zero garbage
town in the country. In order to achieve this they follow a ten point
charter :
|
1. |
Extend the scheme of
door to door collection with segregation to entire town and make the
streets and roads garbage free. |
|
2. |
Introduce night sweeping
at bus stand and important roads, etc., and maintain cleanliness 24
hours. |
|
3. |
Extend the scheme of
door-to-door collection and sweeping on Holidays and Sundays and
make the town clean on all days by continuous sweeping. |
|
4. |
Make the parks and
burial grounds beautiful and attractive through NGO and voluntary
agencies. |
|
5. |
Remove encroachments on
all roads and streets. |
|
6. |
Prevent road-side
hotels, lorry repair shops, etc., on the national highway and
maintain it beautifully by planting trees. |
|
7. |
Remove pigs and dogs
from the town. |
|
8. |
Levy service charges on
hotels, Kalyanamandapams, commercial complexes and garbage
generating industries. |
|
9. |
Manufacturing of Vermi-compost
from organic waste through voluntary organization / private agencies
on B.O.T. basis, sell the inorganic recyclable garbage and convert
the compost yard into Nandavanam. |
|
10 |
Engage two mob-up teams
with two auto model carriers to remove the waste then and there,
round the clock, and make the town garbage free. |
Since
door-to-door collection is being done by private groups, municipal safai
karamcharis have been engaged for night sweeping on main roads, bus
stand, markets and industrial areas. This activity is also being done on
all Sundays and holidays. Sanitary inspectors have been appointed to
impose spot fines upon those who resort to littering. For vermi-composting
a unit has been set up 2 kms outside the town over an area of 8.53
acres. The compost is either sold or utilised for parks / gardens under
the supervision of the municipal authorities.
This
experiment has been successful due to a holistic approach with all
agencies cooperating together under the leadership of the District
Collector. The committee includes the district administration, the
municipality, consortium of NGOs, women self-help groups, schools,
market associations, industrial associations, RWAs and ragpickers.
Although Namakkal is a small town, with a population of 60 to 70,000, it
is having two major industries – body-building of 60 per cent of CNG
tankers in the country and a very large and well-organised poultry
industry. Hence, if no effort was made the town would have virtually
turned into a garbage ridden town. Now an awareness has been created
where every citizen accepts the responsibility of keeping the town clean
and ensuring that nothing is thrown anywhere except in a bin.
Solutions
As utilisation of municipal
solid waste is everybody’s responsibility a holistic view has to be
taken to achieve the desired results. NGOs have ample expertise in this
field and can be usefully entrusted as consultants to bring out the
desired results. In every town a pilot programme should be carried out
and the success story should be circulated to other localities for
replication. As a start, government housing localities should be
selected like police lines, residential areas of government
institutions, university and college campuses, etc., where local or
outside interference is non-existent. Once a demonstrable unit is
functional, nearby RWA office bearers could be invited for seeing for
themselves the benefits. In turn, the RWAs should be given incentives
for setting up the infrastructure and initial functioning of the unit,
till they can themselves stand on their feet.
Children from
the local schools should be trained for catalysing community action.
Parent eco-clubs should be formed and during parents / teachers meeting,
the involved NGOs could brief them on the benefits of usefully utilising
waste. Some of these parents may be office bearers of their RWA and they
can influence other residents to implement the scheme.
Ragpickers in
a particular town (except those who are foreigners) should be
systematically inducted into the scheme by allotting them localities
with more interaction with RWAs. In this way, a large number of
marginalised sections of the society will be provided with decent
livelihoods. This will enable them to integrate into the mainstream of
society and prevent them from carrying out unlawful activities. If women
are employed, it will free the children from such tasks and they can
then attend schools and at least get basic education leading to a decent
employment. It will also prevent them from being exploited by law
enforcement agencies. As they will be registered, the RWAs will be able
to ensure their good conduct and in case of any mishap the culprits can
easily be traced and brought to book.
Better
coordination between RWAs and municipal authorities is essential. The
municipal supervisor attached to a locality should be made accountable
for its overall cleanliness and a part of the municipal budget could be
allotted to the RWA for expenditure. A sense of cooperation and removal
of suspicions, without incrimination, would help immensely. To make the
scheme a success, the legislators (M.P., MLA, and Municipal Councillors)
have to hold hands, irrespective of their party affiliations and render
full support to the civil administrator (District Collector) to make
things work. Finally, it has to be remembered that waste is wealth
and a business package for sustenance of the scheme will be an incentive
for the creation of a clean and healthy town / city.
q
"It appears
that man has lost his capacity to foresee and forestall. He will end
destroying
the earth and with it, ofcourse, himself perish" —
S. Nithya, CLEAN-Dindigul
Back to Contents
|