Reaching the Unreached
Breaking Barriers in Rural Communication

 

‘The individual increasingly comes to know who he is through the stand he takes when he expresses his ideas, values, beliefs, and convictions, and through the declaration and ownership of his feelings.’

Clark Moustakas

The traditional communication model was unidirectional and top-down, using the one size fits all formula. Development practitioners assumed to know what and how was best for the community. And in the process most of the audience was left untouched. However, development practice has proven that the top-down approach can now be put behind. Exposure to mainstream media has fuelled the aspiration of the rural community, creating a brand new participatory model. Rural communication has come of age.

Today, communication strategies have an amazing opportunity to engage audiences. There is growing involvement of the community, with common interests and a common heritage, making it possible to have a two-way model. Moreover, rural communication has moved from engagement to empowerment. The community (particularly youth and women) is increasingly and actively involved in the development, production and management of communication.

Earlier, civil society organisations experimented with various forms of communication with community involvement, particularly folk forms for creating awareness. Thus, nautankis, puppet shows and street plays were used very effectively to get the message across. However, the transition from folk to technology has truly broken the barriers in rural communication, leading to the use of mass communication on an alternative scale. The Community Radios and Video Volunteers are using the ‘slice of life’ – a simple and direct approach, touching the very core of people and the communities.

When, in the year 2002, the Government of India approved a breakthrough policy for granting licenses to set up Community Radio Stations, various organisations and professionals, including Development Alternatives, saw this as an opportunity for a greater role of the community in taking charge of its own development and in giving it direction and impetus. The communication has now become Community Owned and Community Managed (COCOM) and radio and video are very effective in such initiatives.

The radio as a portable and a wide reach medium and the audio-visual media with its ‘seeing is believing’ strength have been valuable in behaviour change communication. The Shubh Kal campaign of Development Alternatives, led by Radio Bundelkhand, has galvanised rural communities in one hundred villages to understand climate change and fashion their own adaptation solutions. They have shown the power of media owned by communities where they do not have to wait for governments to provide solutions.

However, new media such as mobile and ICT are still relatively virgin sectors in rural communication with a lot of possibilities. With over 929 million mobile subscribers in May 2012, and growing rapidly each month, mobile networks can become India’s largest information platform. There is a lot of scope for innovations and usage of such new age media in rural communication and development. One such remarkable innovation is the Lifelines India initiative of Development Alternatives, where over 1,75,000 queries from remote farmers have been given answers from experts via mobile handsets managed by volunteers.

Rural communications have opened an exciting new chapter in enabling people to take charge of their own lives. The community has demonstrated that it can manage these new communication platforms. The question is: who will and how such initiatives will be supported? q

Indira Mansingh
imansingh@devalt.org

 

Back to Contents

    Subscribe Home

Contact Us

About Us