THE energy situation in India demands
strategic and thoughtful planning with correct emphasis on
various energy sources that are reliable and environment
friendly. Because of its size, India is one of the largest
consumer of energy in the developing world and among the top
20 consumers of commercial energy. On a per capita basis,
however the commercial energy use is only one eighth of the
world average (=300 kg ce).
India’s importance as a global energy consumer will continue
to grow. In 1991-92, 27 percent of the import bill was
accounted for by petroleum. In spite of the increasing use
of coal in the energy sector and the large growth of the
power sector, India suffers energy shortages that have
severe economic side effects.
Pattern of Energy Consumption
Energy in the form of electricity is the
major input into industrial and agricultural activities and
has a direct impact on the process of economic development.
The pattern of sector wise electricity consumption is given
in the Graph A. The share of electricity in the Indian
industry has declined due to growing rural electrification.
The picture gets complicated by the fact that the demand of
electricity is likely to double by the year 2004-05
necessitating huge investments that will not readily be
forthcoming.
The demand for petroleum products also continues to rise
rapidly at an average annual growth rate of 6.4 percent.
The demand in the year 1996-97 is estimated to be 81 million
tonnes, with the domestic production being only 44 million
tonnes.
Traditional biomass provides from one third to one half of
India’s total energy needs and nearly three quarters of all
the household energy. On the national scale fuel wood
contributes 65 percent of the total non-commercial energy.
The energy conversion efficiency of biomass fuels, however,
remain poor. In many villages the total energy supply is
mainly form biomass resources (as shown in the Graph B).
In spite of large investments nuclear energy has contributed
only 0.3 percent to total energy scenario and 2.0 percent in
the overall power sector without much record of the actual
generation of kilowatt hours. This is coupled with nuclear
hazards posing dangers to humans as demonstrated by cases
like Chernobyll.
Energy Shortage and Inefficiencies
Like many quickly developing nations,
India suffers energy shortages that have severe energy
shortages that have severe economic consequences. Over the
last decade, shortages of coal and electricity have
progressively worsened, largely because of low energy prices
that do not provide sufficient return to producers.
Electric power generation falls some 10 percent short of
demand on a nationwide basis, with even greater shortages in
some regions. Economic losses associated with these power
shortages are estimated at 1 to 2 percent of the national
income.
The losses would undoubtedly be larger but for the fact that
many industries have invested in backup generators.
Unfortunately, these divert capital that might be put to
some better use and drive up diesel fuel consumption,
further inflating oil imports.
Widespread inefficiency intensifies energy shortfalls. More
than 20 percent of the electricity generated by the nation’s
power plants, for example, is lost during transmission and
distribution, even though present technology applications
have the potential to reduce transmission and distribution
losses in developing countries to as low as 7 to 10
percent. Outdated equipment and processes make Indian
industries considerably less efficient than their
counterparts in the industrialised world. For example,
steel requires at least twice as much energy to manufacture
in Indian than in industrialised countries.
The steel industry, India’s largest energy user, recently a
10 percent energy saving by improving monitoring and
operating procedures. There is potential for greater
efficiency, with appropriate investments, to the tune of 45
percent or more. Boilers, for example burn over 60 percent
of the subcontinent’s industrial fuel but fall far below
modern efficiency standards. According to one study, a
successful boiler rebuilding and replacement programme could
cut national energy consumption in boilers by as much 12
percent by the year 2000.
Another recent study estimated that by 2005, the electricity
consumption could be slashed by 20 percent through a
combination of measures including refitting in-efficient
irrigation pumps, using compact fluorescent instead of
incandescent bulbs in newly constructed buildings, improving
industrial operations and maintenance, and promoting
high-efficiency motors. Such innovations could be
frustrated, however, innovations could be frustrated,
however by the electricity shut-down and extreme
fluctuations in voltage, experienced in most regions of the
country.
Various barriers impede progress towards energy efficiency.
Subsidies that keep energy prices artificially low are the
most notable. Until quite recently, in fact, the price of
coal was lower than the cost of production. As for
electricity, the cost of producing one kilowatt-hour (KWh)
in 1991 was about 3.5 cents, whereas actual returns were
estimated at 2.75 cents pe kWh. Low tariffs for
agricultural operations in particular, have resulted in huge
losses for state electricity boards, hindering their ability
to augment power generation capacity. By the end of 1991,
the accumulated losses of all state electricity operations
due to subsidies was approximately $1.65 billion. The
situation is deteriorating.
Environmental Considerations
The rapid
increase in thermal power generations and increased
consumption of oil in the transport sector has led to a
sharp rise in environmental pollution. Though accurate
estimates are available, the deteriorating conditions in the
cities make it imperative that environmental considerations
become a part of the energy policy.
Self reliance continues to be a thrust area in nuclear power
development. Work on 500 Mwe units and the on-going work on
fast breeder technology will have to be continued with
vigour during the Eighth plan. However, a major area of
concern in this sector has been the inordinate delays in
project implementation and the consequent cost over runs.
It is also necessary to set up adequate support facilities
in terms of fuel fabrication and reprocessing.
Considering the above, it is worth ascertaining whether the
investment in nuclear power is commensurate with the energy
it provides. Are the alternate energy sources getting due
attention with proper R&D? Do we have reliable data and
ultimately, what is the best possible path by which energy
can be supplied in harmony with the environment?
Energy
Policy
The
energy policy drawn up by the government of India has the
following main elements:
·
Accelerate the development of
domestic conventional energy sources viz coal, hydel, oil
and nuclear power.
·
Management of demand for oil and
other forms of energy.
·
Energy conservation and
management.
·
Optimum utilisation of the
existing capacity in the country.
·
Development and exploitation of
renewable sources of energy to meet the energy requirement
of rural communities.
·
Intensify R&D in the field of
new and renewable energy sources.
·
Organisation of and training for personnel engaged at
various levels in the energy sector.
The policy as such may be sound but the
main question that arise are:
·
Whether the allocations for
Non-Renewable Sources of Energy are adequate?
·
Is nuclear power not getting an
allocation more than it deserves?
·
Are we implementing the policy
of the government properly?
·
Should not
our energy policy consider environmental issues adequately?
If yes how?
The growing environmental damage demands
a review of the energy policy. Thought has to be given to
limiting the use of fossils to avoid the greenhouse effect.
The options available are nuclear energy and alternative
energy. However, can nuclear fission reactors provide the
energy needed to offset the loss of fossil fuel supply, or
can alternative renewable energy sources be the solution,
provided more investments are diverted into this area?
(Dr. N.K Bansal
is professor at the Centre for Energy Studies, IIT Delhi.
This is an excerpt of a background paper he prepared for a
brainstorming session organised by Max Mueller Bhawan and
IIT).
MARKET POTENTIAL
|
|
China |
India |
U.S |
Existing Generating Capacity |
146,000 Mwe |
80,000 MW |
690,000 Mwe |
Electric Capacity Growth |
9% annual growth rate expected in the 90s, 15 to 20 GW/yr |
8 to 9% annual growth for the next 10 yrs, 6 to 8 GW/yr |
1 to 1.5% annual growth for the next 10 yrs, 7 to 10
W/yr |
Goals and Incentives |
No special incentives currently exist, rules for
private power development not clear |
Goals and/or incentives exist for renewable energy
technologies, energy efficiency & rural
electrification |
Incentives exist for renewable and cogeneration.
Increasingly competitive market place. |
Wind |
23 MWe of wind power plants installed to date,
national goal of 1,000 Mwe by the year 2,000.
Resource potential over 160 Gwe. |
114 Mwe of wind power platns installed to date, over
900 Mwe being planned, resource potential is over
20,000 Mwe. |
1720 Mwe of wind plants have been installed to date
and a goal of 10,000 Mwe by 2000 is set by the
American Wind Energy Association. |
Biomass |
Greaterst bagasse cogneration potential in Quangxi
Province, 1200 to 2700 Mwe |
World’s largest sugar producer, has the potential for
at least 7000 Mwe from bagasse cogeneration |
6000 MWe have been installed to date. Over 20
projects are under evaluation under DOE sponsorship. |
Dispersed |
Rural electrification programs for wind, biomass and
small hydro. 140,000 small wind turbines exist in
inner Mongolia. |
Significant small hydro potential. Rural
electrification programs for PV and biomass exist |
Grid connected distributed application using PV, fuel
cells, small gas turbines is an emerging market. |
Funds |
China opening doors to private investment,
particularly in power sector |
Indian Renewable Energy Development Authority has $450
M from World Bank for renewable energy. |
Private financing available form multiple sources. |
Back to Contents |