The
Marrakesh Accords and Developing Countries
Kalipada Chatterjee
It
took three years after Rio for the Climate Convention to enter into
force. It took two more years to design and adopt the Kyoto Protocol
in 1997. It seems that the negotiations have slowed down with every
meeting and the commitments made by the developed country Parties in
Kyoto are being diluted by offering concessions to achieve
ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. By far, the biggest winner in
Marrakesh was Russia. The Kyoto treaty cannot come into force unless
at least 55 country Parties to the Convention that emit 55 percent
of the total carbon dioxide emissions during 1990 from the Parties
included in Annex I have ratified the Protocol. So far, 40 countries
have ratified the Protocol including one developed country
(Romania). The Marrakesh Conference was attended by 171 governments
and about 4500 participants. COP 8 will be held from 23 October to 1
November 2002 and will be hosted by India.
The
Climate Change Convention and Kyoto Protocol
One
of the important affirmation recorded in the Marrakesh Accords is
their affirmation that it is the responsibility of the Parties to
the Convention as well as to the Protocol to protect the climate
system for the benefit of present and future generations of human
kind on the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but
differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities and
their social and economic condition. Accordingly, it is primarily
the responsibility of developed countries to take the lead in
combating climate change and adverse effects thereof.
Funding
Another
very import Marrakesh accord is the creation of different funds for
the implementation of the commitments of the developed countries
made under the Convention. These funds are :
l |
Increased
GEF replenishment |
l |
The
special climate change fund to be established under this
decision |
l |
The
least developed countries fund to be established under this
decision |
l |
Bilateral
and multilateral sources |
|
Developed
country Parties are to : |
l |
Develop
appropriate modalities for burden sharing among Annex II
Parties |
l |
Report
their financial contribution on an
annual basis |
The
Conference of Parties is to review the reports annually.
As a
part of the Marrakesh accord, European Community and its member
states, together with Canada, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway and
Switzerland made a joint declaration to contribute collectively US $
401 million annually by 2005, with their level to be reviewed in
2008.
The
accord also decided to establish an adaptation fund to finance
adaptation projects and programmes in the areas of water resource
management, land management, agriculture, health infrastructure
development, fragile ecosystems, including mountainous ecosystems
and integrated coastal zone management in developing country parties
that are Parties to the Protocol.
Activities
Implemented Jointly (AIJ) under the Pilot Phase
The
Marrakesh accord decided to continue the pilot phase for AIJ, to
provide the developing country Parties opportunity for learning by
doing. The geographical distribution of Activities Implemented
Jointly however still remains unbalanced despite recent
improvements.
Participation
in AIJ under the Pilot Phase provides an important opportunity for
learning by doing.
Capacity
building in Developing Countries
Capacity
building for developing counties is essential to enable them to
participate fully in and to implement effectively their commitment
under the UNFCCC and for their effective participation in the Kyoto
Protocol process. There is no "one size fits all" formula
for capacity building. Capacity building must be country driven,
addressing the specific needs and conditions of developing countries
and reflecting their national sustainable development strategies,
priorities and initiatives. Capacity building is a continuous,
progressive and iterative process, where implementation should be on
the priorities of developing countries.
One
of the areas of capacity building as identified by the COP is Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM), preparation of emission baseline,
additionality test methodologies, certified project activities,
incorporating Sustainable Development Goals and their M&V and
certification by OEs.
Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM)
The
purpose of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is to assist
developing country Parties in achieving sustainable development and
in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention and to
assist the developed country Parties in achieving compliance with
their commitments made under Article 3 of the Kyoto Protocol (KP).
The Marrakesh Accords affirmed that it is the host Party’s
prerogative to confirm whether a CDM project activity assists the
country in achieving sustainable development, and further emphasized
that CDM project activities should lead to the transfer of
environmentally safe and sound technologies and know how in addition
to the transfer of funds in addition to normal ODA flows to that
developing country.
A
reliable, Transparent and Conservative Baseline
A
reliable, transparent and conservative baseline to assess
additionality criteria as defined in paragraph 5 (c) of the Article
12 of the Kyoto Protocol which states that emission reduction from
each project activity has to be certified by operational entities (OEs)
on the basis of reduction in emissions that are additional to any
that would occur in the absence of the certified project activity
and carbon reductions / carbon avoided through a CDM project
activity for accurately calculating the number of units of CERs (viz;
1 unit of CER is one metric tonne of CO2 equivalent).
CDM
Executive Board
Symbolizing
the transition now being made to an operational Kyoto regime, the
conference elected 15 members to the Executive Board of the Clean
Development Mechanism. This will ensure a
prompt start to the CDM in developing countries to promote
sustainable development through CDM project activities that would
bring additional foreign investment and clean technologies for
reduction or avoidance of carbon emissions.
It
was decided that the draft rules and procedures agreed upon during
COP 7 will apply until the same is adopted by COP during the eighth
session. Further, simplified modalities and procedures will be
developed and recommended at its eighth session (COP 8) for
small-scale CDM project activities : (i) renewable energy project
activities with a maximum output capacity equivalent of upto 15
megawatt (or an appropriate equivalent) (ii) energy efficiency
improvement project activities that reduce energy consumption on
the supply and/or demand side by up to the equivalent of 15
gigawatthours per year, and (iii) other project activities that both
reduce anthropogenic emissions by sources and that directly emit
less than 15 kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent annually.
Landuse
Landuse Change and Forestry (LULUCF)
LULUCF
project activities under the CDM is limited to afforestation and
reforestation and during the first commitment period (2008-2012),
the total of addition to a Party’s assigned amount resulting from
eligible LULUCF project activities under CDM should not exceed one
percent of base year emissions (1990) of that Party times five.
Project
activity starting as of the year 2000 will be eligible for
validation and registration as CDM if submitted for registration
before 31st December 2005. If registered, the crediting period for
such project activities may start prior to the date of its
registration but not earlier than 1st January 2000.
CDM
Participation Requirement for Developing Country Parties
l |
Is
a voluntary participation approved by each Party involved |
l |
Parties
participating in CDM shall designate a national authority
for the CDM |
l |
A
party to the Kyoto Protocol |
Validation
and Registration of the CDM Project Activity
Validation
is a process of independent evaluation of a project activity by a
designated operational entity (OE) against the requirements of the
CDM on the basis of the project design document. The project design
document includes the following :
A
description of the project comprising
l |
purpose |
l |
technical
description |
l |
justification
of the project boundary |
Baseline
methodology
Application
of an approved methodology
l |
Elaboration
on approved methodology selected |
l |
Description
of how the approved methodology will be applied in the
context of the project |
Application
of a new methodology
l |
description
of the baseline methodology and justification of choice,
including an assessment of strengths and weaknesses of the
methodology |
l |
description
of key parameters, data sources and assumptions used in the
baseline estimate and assessment of uncertainties |
l |
project
baseline emissions |
l |
description
or how the baseline methodology address potential leakage |
Other
considerations such as description of how national and / or sectoral
policies and circumstances have been taken into account and
explanation of how the baseline was established in a transparent and
conservative manner.
Calculations
l |
Description
of formulae used to calculate and estimate anthropogenic
emissions by sources of GHGs of the CDM project activity
within the project boundary |
l |
Description
of formulae used to calculate and to project leakage,
defined as : the net change of anthropogenic emissions by
sources of greenhouse gases which occurs outside the CDM
project activity boundary, and that is measurable and
attributable to CDM project activity. |
|
- |
The
sum of the above represents the CDM project activity
emissions |
l |
Description
of formulae used to calculate and to project the
anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHGs of the baseline |
l |
|
Description
of the formulae used to calculate and to project leakage of
the baseline |
|
- |
The
sum of the above represents the baseline emissions |
l |
Difference
between 9.4.1 and 9.2.1 represents the emission reductions
of the CDM project activity |
(All
references to support the above calculations need to be indicated)
Small-scale
CDM Project Activity : Baseline
A
baseline has to be established by project participants in accordance
with provisions for the use of approved and new methodologies in a
transparent and conservative manner regarding the choice of
approaches, assumptions, methodologies, parameters, data sources,
key factors and additionality and taking into account uncertainty.
Additionality
A CDM
project activity is additional if anthropogenic emissions of
greenhouse gases by sources are reduced below these that would have
occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity.
In
the case of small-scale CDM project activities, simplified
procedures will be developed by the COP / MOP.
Registered
Project Activity
Registered
Project Activity is the formal acceptance by the Executive Board of
a validated project as a CDM project activity. Registration is the
pre-requisite for the verification, certification and issuance of
the CERs related to that project activity.
A baseline
has to be established on a project specific basis taking into
account relevant national and / or sectoral policies and
circumstances, such as sectoral reform initiatives, local fuel
availability, power sector expansion plans and the economic
situations in the project sector. The baseline may include a
scenario where future anthropogenic emissions by source are
projected to rise above current levels, due to the specific
circumstances of the host Party.
Approaches
that deemed most appropriate in choosing a baseline methodology.
These approaches are :
l |
existing actual or historical emissions as applicable |
l |
emissions from a technology that represents an economically
attractive course of action, taking into account barriers to
investment; or |
l |
the average emissions of similar project activities undertaken in
the previous five years, in similar social, economic,
environmental and technological circumstances and whose
performance is among the top
20 percent of their category
|
Crediting
period
Project
participants should select a crediting period for a proposed project
activity from one of the following approaches:
a) |
a maximum of 7 years which may be renewed at most two times,
provided for each renewal, a designated OE determines and informs
the Executive Board that the original baseline is still valid or
has been updated taking into account, new data where applicable;
or |
b) |
a
maximum of ten years with no option of renewal. |
Leakage
Reduction
in anthropogenic emission by sources has to be adjusted for leakage.
Subsequent to the monitoring and reporting of reductions in
anthropogenic emissions, CERs resulting from a CDM project activity
during a specified time period is to be calculated by substracting
the actual anthropogenic emissions by sources from baseline
emissions and adjusting for leakage.
Monitoring
Project
participants are required to include as a part of the project design
document, a monitoring plan for collection and archiving of all
relevant data necessary for estimating or measuring of anthropogenic
emissions by sources, for determining the baseline of greenhouse
gases within the project boundary during the crediting period, and
identification of potential sources of emissions outside the project
boundary that are significant and reasonably attributable to the
project activity during the crediting period.
Monitoring
Plan
l |
Identification of data needs and data quality with regard to
accuracy, comparability, completeness and validity |
l |
Methodologies to be used for data collection and monitoring,
including quality assurance and quality control provision for the
monitoring, collecting and reporting |
l |
In the case of a new monitoring methodology, provide a description
of the methodology, including an assessment of strengths and
weaknesses of the methodology and whether or not it has been
successful elsewhere |
Verification
and Certification
Verification
is the periodic independent review and export determination by the
designated operational entity of the monitored reductions in
anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that have
occurred as a result of a registered CDM project activity during the
verification period.
Certification
is the written assurance by the designated operational entity that
during a specified period, a project activity achieved the reduction
in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases. The
designated operational entity contracted by the project participants
to perform the verification shall make the monitoring report
publicly available, and conduct on-site inspections, as appropriate;
that may comprise a review of performance records, interviews with
project participants and local stakeholders, collection of
measurements, observation of established practices and testing of
the accuracy of monitoring equipment.
Compliance
Mechanism
One
of the most important aspect of the negotiation at Marrakesh was the
compliance mechanism.
Environmental
Impacts
The
following documents need to be sent to the national and
international authorities while submitting the project for approval:
l |
Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts,
including transboundary impacts |
l |
If impacts are considered significant by the project participants
or the host party: conclusions and references to support
documentation of an EIS that has been undertaken in accordance
with the procedures as required by the host country |
Other
documents required with the project submissions are :
l |
Information on sources of public funding for the project activity
from Parties included in Annex I which shall provide an
affirmation that such funding does not result in a diversion of
official development assistance (ODA) and is separate from and is
not counted towards the financial obligations of these Parties. |
l |
Stakeholder comments including brief description of the process, a
summary of the comments received, and a report on how due account
was taken of any comments received. |
The
Marrakesh Declaration
The
conference also adopted the Marrakesh Ministerial Declaration as
input into next September’s World Summit on Sustainable
Development in Johannesburg (South Africa). The declaration
reaffirmed that economic and social development and poverty
eradication are the first and overriding priorities of the
developing countries. The declaration recognised that the World
Summit on Sustainable Development provides an important opportunity
for addressing the linkages between climate change and
sustainable development, and that in this context, the problems
of poverty, land degradation, access to water and food and human
health remain the center of the global attention; therefore the
synergies between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the United Nations
Convention to Combat Desertification in those countries experiencing
Serious Drought and / or Desertification should continue to be
explored in order to achieve sustainable development.
At Marrakesh, there
was a great expectation that most of the outstanding issues will be
resolved so that there can be no further obstacles to the Parties to
ratify the Kyoto Protocol to meet the Rio + 10 deadline for entry
into force, but the rule book is yet to be developed fully for
implementation of this important treaty. It is hoped COP 8 to be
hosted by India will try to resolve all the outstanding issues for a
successful implementation of the Convention and Protocol.
|