Shelter, Employment And The Urban Poor |
An
ever-increasing share of the world’s population lives in urban areas.
According to the United Nations secretariat, the urban population has grown
from less than 30 percent of humanity in 1950 to about 45 percent in 1995. By
the year 2005, every second human being will live in cities and towns. This
global picture, however, shows considerable regional differences. While
already today three quarters of all inhabitants in the developed countries
and in Latin America live in urban areas, less than a third of the population
in Africa and Asia (excluding the Arab countries) is urban. Yet it is in
those countries that the rate of urbanization is highest. The population of
urban areas in developing countries grows currently at a rate of at least 3.6
percent annually, about four times faster than in rural areas. This means
that the urban population of developing countries increases by some 170,000
persons every day, compared to “only” 60,000 per day in rural areas. United
Nations secretariat projections show that 40 percent of the population in
developing countries will live in urban areas by the turn of this century and
that the urban population will overtake the rural population in about 20
years. By the year 2030, two thirds of the population in developing countries
will live in urban areas.
The Urbanization of Poverty
Today, one fifth of all human beings (about 1.4 billion
people) live in absolute poverty, without adequate food, clothing and
shelter. Some 1.3 billion live in developing countries, most of these (about
one billion) in rural area. This situation, however, is changing swiftly.
Although there are still uncertainties on the exact year when the urban poor
will outnumber the rural poor, the trend is clear; not only are we living in
an increasingly urbanized world, we are also experiencing an urbanization of
poverty. One of the most visible characteristics of poverty is the shelter
conditions under which people live. The vast majority of those with incomes
below the poverty line are also living under inadequate shelter conditions.
Adequate shelter implies more than a roof over one’s head: it means adequate
privacy, adequate space, adequate security, adequate lighting and ventilation,
adequate basic infrastructure and adequate location with regard to work and
basic facilities - all at a reasonable cost. Although “only” 300 million
urban dwellers in developing countries are currently living in absolute
poverty, without sufficient incomes to fulfil even basic nutritional and
shelter requirements, it should be kept in mind that these are not the only
underprivileged urban dwellers. The rapidly increasing pressure on urban
areas causes considerable strain, not only on the urban infrastructure and on
housing, but also on the urban environment. By 1990, at least 600 million
people in the urban areas of developing countries were living under life- and
health - threatening conditions. In some cities, more than half of the
population live in slums and squatter settlements. Most people living under
such conditions also face another problem: continued unemployment and
underemployment. What is even worse, in most cities and towns the shelter
delivery system and the demand for labour are unable to keep pace with the
staggering urban population growth. It is thus not surprising that a large
proportion of the 700 million people added to the urban population of
developing countries during this decade alone may end up unemployment or with
very low incomes, living in slums or squatter settlements.
The Global Strategy for
Shelter
The main objective of the Global Strategy for Shelter
to the Year 2000-as adopted by the General Assembly of the United
Nations in December 1988-is to facilitate adequate shelter for all. The
strategy recognizes that despite decades of direct government
intervention in housing supply, the present housing situation in
developing countries is worse than ever. It thus calls for governments
to leave the actual production of housing units to the private sector
and to community efforts, and to provide legal, financial and
institutional support to this process instead. This principle of
enabling shelter strategies has since been adopted by many governments.
The sheer magnitude of the shelter problem, however, remains the main
obstacle to the success of the strategy. Although exact global figures
are not available, the experiences from individual countries suggest
that the number of people living in inadequate shelter is still
increasing. Although the introduction of enabling strategies has
improved the shelter conditions of large population groups, the needs
and potential of the poorest groups may not have been properly
addressed. Experience suggests that direct interventions-targeted
subsidies-may be required to improve the shelter conditions of the
poorest groups, i.e. those that are unable to take advantage of
free-market conditions. More and more cities are faced with growing
unemployment, homelessness, crime, disease and pollution. It was this
dilemma that, in 1992, prompted governments to call upon the United
Nations to convene the second United Nations to convene the second
United Nations Conference of Human Settlements (Habitat II) - the “City
Summit” - 1996.
Investing in Shelter.....
Habitat’s strategy for poverty reduction emphasizes
that investments in shelter are productive investments, rather than
consumption expenditure. Investments in housing geenerate income and
increase the labour productivity of the occupants. This has one major
implication for development policies: it implis that housing is not only
a goal, but more importantly it is a tool of development policy. Any
investment in housing or infrastructure has effects on the national
income that go far beyond the direct investment itself. Increased
housing activities trigger additional investments in building-materials
production, transport and marketing. They also lead to higher demand
for a variety of local goods from the additional employes in these
sectors - who are mainly semi-skilled and unskilled laboureres with
little propensity for buying imported goods - and thus increased
investments in the production of such goods as well. Experiences from a
number of countries indicate that, for every unit of currency spent
directly on house construction, an additional unit of currency is added
to the naitonal income through such multiplier effects.
...and Small-scale
Enterprises
In addition, low-cost housing
construction generates more jobs per unit of investment than high-cost
housing, and informal-sector construction methods are more
labour-intensive than formal ones. Experiences from several countries
indicate that informal-sector housing creates about 20 percent more jobs
per unit of expenditure than formal-sector housing and, at the same
time, six time as many (although lower standard) dwellings can be built
for the same investment. Similar lessons apply to the provision,
operation and maintenance of various types of infrastructure and
services: the construction of roads, the laying of water pipes, drains
and sewers, and solid-waste management. The involvement of small-scale
informal construction enterprises in the execution of housing and
infrastructure projects should therefore be supported, as they use more
unskilled labour, fewer imports and less hard currency than their
large-scale, formal-sector counterparts. Experience also demonstrates
that formal sector housing is unaffordable for the poor. In most cases
such housing, although officially intended for the poor, is inhabited
by middle- and high-income households.
The informal housing sector, despite advantages and considerable output,
is often neglected in favour of a relatively inefficient formal
sector. One should, however, be careful not to embrace the activities
of the informal sector without reservation. Its non-compliance with
health, safety and internationally accepted labour standards is very
serious indeed. Yet the reality is that the vast majority of housing
units in most developing countries continue to be constructed through
informal-sector activities. The formal sector is unable to address
increasing housing needs. There is thus an urgent need to facilitate
the activities of the informal part of the economy, while at the same
time actively encouraging adherence to acceptable health, safety and
labour standards.
A Common Strategy
The fact is that even an increasing number of
middle-income salary earners also have to live under inadequate shelter
conditions. Higher incomes alone do not solve the problem. What is
required is a strategy that increases incomes and housing supply at the
same time. The future priorities of local and national governments -
must therefore be to actively support and advocate poverty-reduction
strategies based on labour-intensive shelter delivery using local
resources and linking the goals of shelter and employment for all as a
common strategy for poverty reduction.
|
“Instruction Manual
For Appropriate Building Systems”
by Shelter Group,
Development Alternatives, with Building Materials & Technology
Promotion Council
The Instruction Manual for Appropriate Building
Systems is a compilation of valuable information of Compressed
Earth Block walling, Micro Concrete Tile roofing and a number of
related construction technology. It highlights principles of each
technology, its basic and cost implications.
The format makes it easy for the reader to decide which material
or technique is most suitable for their purposes and fits their
budget. Each technology is presented under several different
headings, introduction to the material, how to build with it and
how much would it cost. Another section describes how to actually
produce selected materials.
Each page is an interesting mixture of clear, simple live
sketches, written description and comparison to other materials
through graphs.
The book is a must for planners, architects, engineers & builders
with interest in utilising any of the existing alternative
construction technologies that are abound in India today.
At Rs. 150, the cost is small considering the quality of
production and the vast amount of information contained within its
pages. |
|
|