Ecosystem Services for Disaster Risk Reduction
and Sustainable Economy -
Forensic revisit of Uttarakhand 2013 flood and other mega disasters
E cology is the
most talked about subject in India but less understood and least
respected in our policy-planning. Lack of ecological orientation which
characterizes our policy makers is driven by narrow economic notions of
development. We fail to recognise the inextricable links between
sustainable ecology and economic development, which govern human
development particularly in the ecologically sensitive and fragile
regions like mountainous and coastal regions and river basins. ‘Ecology
for Development and Human Security’ is the lesson that the modern
society needs to learn from past civilizations by cross-subjecting the
parametric assessment of the mega-disasters of our times to the forensic
eye. Our hurry to declare ourselves great disaster managers prevents us
from ascertaining the actual cause of aggravated or multiple hazard
events, their relation to land, environment, ecosystems, infrastructure
and socio-economic factors aggravated by the failure of the coping
capacity. We shall keep facing such calamities as long as we ignore
nature’s alert and warning signals that it sends much in advance.
Formally India’s
capacity building interventions on linking climate change adaptation
with disaster management started in 2007 with National Institute of
Disaster Management’s pilot training module which was linked to the
United Nations Development Programme’s Climate Resilient Development and
Adaptation project. We called it a 2nd
paradigm shift in Disaster Risk Management. Another module on
‘Environment and Disasters’ was launched in 2009. The Government of
Uttar Pradesh sponsored a study by National Environmental Engineering
Research Institute of the hilly districts of Uttarakhand and the risk of
disasters was discussed therein while envisaging the roles ecosystems
can play in ensuring sustainable human development. Another study on the
green-house effect emphasized the role of natural vegetation strands in
regulating micro and local climate vis-à-vis erosion and siltation.
However, these lessons have not been taken into consideration while
devising the model of economic development in the Himalayas.
The interventions of
German Development Organisation through the Indo-German Environment
Programme with MoEF in India (Environmental Knowledge for Disaster Risk
Management 2010-13) and its theme on Natural Resource Management -
Disaster Risk Management linkage resulted in the development of a pilot
‘climate resilient disaster management’ project at the district and
village level in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh while an ecosystem based
adaptation has been envisaged in the Kosi Basin Programme of
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. A
documentation of the tsunami recovery programme that lays much stress on
ecosystem based interventions like ‘Mangroves For the Future’ are clear
lessons to be taken into account in our deliberations on disaster risk
reduction process in ecologically sensitive areas. Wetlands play an
important role in water retention, purification and re-charge, and -even
more importantly- in flood control. Destruction of whole ecosystems,
catchments, watersheds, wetlands, and change of land-use regimes in the
name of development has caused instability, heavy siltation and
landslides. Our failure to understand the linkages between the impacts
of earthquake, forest fire, land-slides, water scarcity and floods
contributed to building collapses in the Uttarakhand disaster. These
challenges are not confined only to the Himalayas but are present in
several other areas of the country where environmental devastations
occur with an aggravated frequency and intensity.
q
Dr. Anil Kumar
envirosafe2007@gmail.com
Sreeja S Nair
sreejanair22@gmail.com
Back to Contents |