GREENS AND
BUSINESS
WE NEED DIALOGUE
"Environmental
economics could be the common language for a dialogue between
environmentalists and industrialists"
Dr. Martin Holdgate, Director General, IUCN
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
There can be no doubt that the world will rapidly industrialize during the
coming decades. The billions of people living in poverty in the developing
countries will accept no less. Depending on how it is managed, this
industrialisation will create a better quality of life for everyone- or an
environmental disaster of unimaginable dimensions.
Because the stakes are so high, it is urgent that we all work together to
solve our environmental problems. The business community must invent new
industrial technologies that reduce pollution and consume less energy and
other natural resources. At the same time, governments must devise workable
regulatory regimes and economic incentives, and environmentalists must promote
analysis and understanding of environmental issues.
Unfortunately, industrialists and environmentalists do not always work
together effectively. Dialogue often breaks down for two reasons. The first
relates to the divisions within each of the two communities. For example,
while some corporations energetically pursue low waste technologies and
evaluate the environmental impact of their products, others merely seek to
avoid legal penalties. Some firms, whether financially weak or simply
unscrupulous, choose to ignore their environmental responsibilities.
Similarly, the environmental movement has been described as an extremely broad
church. Some environmental groups are convinced that corporations are valuable
allies in the fight to save the environment; they influence business through
moral persuasion. Others suspect that companies use their knowledge and public
relations skills to evade rather than to met their environmental obligations;
these groups play a positive role by challenging the blander assertions of
governments and firms and making the public more environmentally aware.
A second and more profound barrier to communication is that environmentalists
and industrialists speak different languages. This is because most people in
industry are trained in law, economics, engineering or technology. Members of
the conservation and environment movement tend to be educated in biology, the environmental
sciences, or the social sciences.
The common language that could span this divide is that of environmental
economics. As environmentalists, we must accept that economics will remain
central to the decision making of business and government. For their part,
industrialists must recognize the weaknesses in current economic science.
Environmental resources are rarely valued correctly, and economic measures
such as GNP are transparently absurd form and environmental standpoint. By
incorporating environmental and quality-of-life values into economic equation,
we can remove many of the distortions that now bias policy making.
Depending on how it is managed, this industrialisation will create a better
quality of life for everyone - or an environmental disaster of unimaginable
dimensions. Improved dialogue between environmentalists and industrialists
must begin with the mutual acceptance of each other’s integrity and ethics.
We all share the same basic desire for a beautiful world, a high quality of
life and sustainable economic growth. To realize this vision, we should avoid
endless debates over general values and focus instead on specific issues. This
approach is working well at the federal and provincial levels in Canada, where
people from industry, conservation groups, government and local communities
meet for face -to-face roundtable discussions.
Such talks will not, of course, replace communication and the sharing of ‘best
practice’ ideas within the corporate community. But it would be
counterproductive if industrialists spoke only among themselves in a closed
circle about their successes. A broader dialogue would have the double
advantage of educating environmentalists about business problems while
challenging firms to boost their environmental performance.
Courtesy : World Link
No. 5
Development Alternatives', a symbol is a
5-pointed star depicting a stylised human figure with its arms
stretched outward, its head pointing skyward, and its feet firmly
rooted in the earth. |
Back
to Contents
|