magine
waking up one day to find India with only 30 million people, 70 per
cent of the land under forests and 97 per cent of the land owned and
controlled by communities. That is PNG, albeit on a much smaller
scale. This country, with a land area of nearly half a million
square kilometers, has only 4 million people organised around
language groups. In this nation of 700 languages with incredible
cultural diversity, are found several endemic floral and faunal
species, including the exotic Birds of Paradise.
For us in India, as in most other Asian
societies, the country is interesting for the communal nature of
land ownership. Even the forests are owned by the people. The state
has the right to only the minerals below the ground. The communal
nature of land ownership implies total control and rights, for
instance to convert forests to other uses or sell it to logging
companies. Contrast this with India where the state is the absolute
owner of forests with the people enjoying minor concessions. And
even then, there are frequent conflicts and clashes between the
forest department and the people.
Interestingly, however, in PNG ownership rights
to forest also mean that local people can sell these rights. And
they often do so.
As a result, the forest area in PNG has been
declining due to conversion to gardens and plantations of coconut,
coffee and palm, and logging and mining. One of the biggest threats
is the large scale logging of timber, estimated at more than 2
million cubic metres annually. Such logging is said to be
environmentally destructive. Further, most of the economic gains
have been captured by the logging companies and, of late, by the
government in the form of an export tax. Due to lack of expertise,
skills and experience the people have usually got a bad deal
(estimates suggest communities get $ 5 of the export price of
$150-200 per cubic metre).
Hence, secure tenure has neither led to
conservation nor have the local people got many benefits. Some have
even found themselves in debt and the little money they received has
been frittered away. The government’s attempt to intervene to
regulate the logging concessions, ostensibly to protect the
environment and to generate more revenue are a source of tension as
local groups strive to retain control over their resources.
It is against this background that the
Biodiversity Conservation Network (BCN) works with local partners to
establish and evaluate an enterprise-based approach to conservation.
BCN funds have been used to support scientific research stations and
eco-tourism businesses in PNG. Both involve the establishment of
lodges and support services as guides and porters. Units for the
manufacture and marketing of artifacts, have also been set up.
The most interesting of these enterprises is the
seemingly incongruous logging project. This BCN supported business
is an attempt at giving communities the capacity to undertake small
scale logging. Local groups are provided with the means to acquire
portable saw mills. Seven to eight people typically work to cut,
transport and saw wood. The wood is usually supplied to the local
market, unlike the larger companies, which export the wood.
The enterprises have achieved mixed success. One
particularly successful unit has, over the past few years,
accumulated enough surplus to purchase a plantation (valued at
$10,000) which had been sold nearly half a century ago to some
outsiders. It is also starting to pay back the loan it took to
acquire the saw mill. At some sites, spin-off enterprises like a
bakery and sewing businesses have been started. Other units are,
however, struggling to establish their businesses.
Information on the environmental impact of the
portable saw mills is scanty. Casual evidence suggests that the
impact is minimal, if for no other reason than the limited scale of
operation of the mills. A portable mill can cut a tree or two per
week, generating between 0.8 to 1.2 cubic metres of finished timber.
Allowing for down time for repairs and maintenance and other
interruptions, the average is considerably lower. With the limited
density of population (small communities of a few hundred people
control literally thousands of hectares of forests), there is
unlikely to be a marked adverse impact on the forests for a long
time.
Apart from generating cash income, the projects
also work to upgrade the technical and business skills of the local
communities. Perhaps, the most significant advantage is the
demonstration of an alternative to large scale logging, even though
they are as yet not in a position to satisfy international demand
for sawn wood.
Although it is too early to say whether these
community-based timber production enterprises will lead to long-term
sustainable harvests, they are, at a minimum, contributing to
conservation by:
► |
keeping the
communities from selling their forest lands to the commercial
logging firms |
► |
providing
information that BCN and its partners can use to understand the
conditions under which enterprise-based approaches to
conservation do and do not work. |