Climate Change
and Governance
by Ashok Khosla and SK Sharma It is not only the Earth’s atmosphere. During recent years, the political and economic systems have also been warming up. Apprehensions about globalisation and growing terrorism are further fuelling and heating them up. Breakthroughs in technologies such as information, genetics and space appear to offer the possibilities of a better life. But if history is anything to go by, it will be a better life for a very few and a worse one for many others. And in the process, Nature will pay the ultimate cost: depletion, destruction, death and extinction. Development — sustainable development, which is the only kind of development there is — has to be different. And to make it different, it needs to be grounded in a framework of widely held ethical principles, principles that are fortunately common to the major faiths and religions of our world. Principles of equity, social justice and respect for life. Human consciousness is on the threshold of either commanding heights or self-annihilation. It now must make fundamental choices on the direction it wants to take. The basis of human consciousness at the top of the evolutionary pyramid falls in the realm of metaphysics. It is a truth that science has not been able to unravel. Science has also not been able to unravel how the earth happens to have an environment that sustains life, especially conscious life, and whether there are other places in the universe that have similar life sustaining systems. Given the magnitude of the cosmos, all we can say is that we need to take care of our earth, presently the only known celestial body that sustains a conscious life form. Major advances have been made in science and technology during the twentieth century. While these have improved the quality of life for some people, and given hope to all, the disparities they have led to have also fuelled widespread social, environmental, economic and political discord. Wide scale denudation of forests in third word nations and over consumption of energy in rich nations are tending to dislocate the environmental balance. Of course, the industrialised countries used to have vast forests too, and a good part of their current wealth is the result of a Faustian bargain made a couple of centuries ago to convert the natural resources they (and the rest of the world had) into that wealth. Energy, and particularly fossil fuels that are responsible for the bulk of carbon emissions into the atmosphere, has until now been seen to be a right of everyone to use as much of as is possible. The massive breakdowns in our planet’s life support systems now under way make it impossible for either the North or the South to carry on with business as usual. The North has to cut down on fossil fuel use and material resource consumption generally by a massive amount. The Factor 10 Club has shown that it is not only possible but imperative that the industrialised economies dematerialise their consumption patterns and production systems by at least an order of magnitude. The South has embarked on a demographic transition that will in due course address the problem of population growth, a problem that can, in fact, only be solved by improving the lives of people. This will mean more energy and resource use, particularly among the poor, but not necessarily in the wasteful manner pioneered by the rich in earlier times. Increased, but much more efficient use of non-renewable resources and growing use of renewable ones is essential if the world is to stabilise into a state where all its citizens are to make for themselves happy and fulfilled lives.
|
||||||
|
||||||