evelopment
and communication are both intertwined. Communication is extremely
essential in any developmental project for long-term results. Both the
terms are loaded with different conceptions and richness of uses and
functions because of their theoretical foundation. This article will be
looking at four main questions: What is development communication? What
are the differences among other ways of communication? Why is it needed
in developmental work in today’s perspective? And what is development
communication, the emerging participatory paradigm?
Development communication
supports sustainable change in development operations by engaging key
stakeholders in the development process. Development communication tries
to establish two-way flows to share knowledge, opinions and perceptions
among the stakeholders. This type of communication also tries to
establish conducive environments for assessing risk and opportunities to
disseminate information, and induce behaviour and social change.
The role of development
communication has become important and relevant
now
more than ever after the continuous failure of the one-way vertical
communication model: sender – message - channel - receiver (SMCR).
Worldwide, the development focus has shifted from economic growth to
include other social dimensions; hence, its approach to communication of
the processes. Sustainability and people’s participation have become key
elements of this new vision, as also acknowledged by the World Bank.
According to the World Bank, ‘Internationally, emphasis is being placed
on the challenges of sustainable development, and participation is
increasingly recognised as a necessary part of sustainable development
strategies.’
Without communication,
participation cannot occur in a large scale or vice verse. Participation
needs to be based on two-way communication principles and practices.
Definition of Development Communication
1. Development communication,
as an interdisciplinary field, is based on empirical research that helps
to build consensus while it facilitates the sharing of knowledge to
achieve a positive change in the development initiative. It is not only
about effective dissemination of information but also about using
empirical research and two-way communications among stakeholders
(Development Communication division, the World Bank )
2. It is a social process based
on dialogue using a broad range of tools and methods. It is also about
seeking change at different levels, including listening, building trust,
sharing knowledge and skill-building policies, debating and learning for
sustained meaningful change. It is not public relation or corporate
communication (Rome Consensus of World Bank 2006)
There are five keywords in
development communication: dialogue, stakeholders, sharing knowledge and
mutual understanding. The first keyword associated with development
communication is dialogue. No matter what kind of project, it is always
valuable and essential to establish dialogue among the stakeholders.
Dialogue is necessary ingredient in building trust, sharing knowledge
and ensures mutual understanding.
Development communication has
two modes of application: monologic mode and dialogic mode. The
participatory model mainly deals with dialogic communication. The
monologic mode is broadly equivalent to the diffusion perspective and is
based on the transmission model. It adopts one-way communication to send
messages, disseminate information, and awareness generation for changing
behaviour. The dialogic mode is closely associated with the
participation perspective and uses two-way communication methods to
build trust, exchange knowledge and perception, achieve mutual
understanding and asses the risk and opportunities. Dialogic approaches
guarantee that relevant stakeholders have their voice to be heard.
In socio-development
initiatives, inclusion of dialogic development communication often
results in the reduction of political risks, the improvements of the
project design and performance, increased transparency and enhanced
people’s voice and participation. For example, many development projects
initiated by the Government fail because from the beginning of the
development project, key stakeholders were not involved in the
preparatory and planning phases. The lack of proper communication at the
initial stage generates suspicions among stakeholders and leads to
misunderstanding and negative attitude towards the projects. The cause
of these problems, and ultimately of the project failure, is the lack of
two-way communication.

Participation ladder of stakeholders in
development communication
Sustainable Civil Society Initiative –
Shubh kal
Climate change is happening.
The science is compelling and the longer we wait, the harder the problem
will be to solve
Shubh Kal,
an initiative of Development Alternatives and the Swiss Agency for
Development and Cooperation is a pilot project and supports measures
that eventually lead to better income, improved resource management,
lower carbon footprint and overall reduction in climate vulnerability of
the population. This project has three target groups: farmers, artisans
and women who are trying to improve their livelihood conditions in the
drought-affected Bundelkhand region. The project area has been facing
constant drought for the last few years; few livelihood options and low
literacy level are major problems and, hence, the initiative has been
trying to improve the lives of these three target groups by devising
micro projects that are relevant to climate change adaptation. Due to
the context, some complexities in the content and to the need for
capacity building, here the communication strategy relies mostly on
interpersonal and group methods like focus group discussion, knowledge
mapping, exposure visits to other relevant project areas, etc. The key
stakeholders have been associated with the process from the beginning so
that no misunder-standing may take root in their mind. We are hopeful
that the initiative will lead to the expected projects results within
the timeframe.
The Emerging Participatory Paradigm
The participatory model of
communication for social change is mainly a new look at the newly
emerging paradigm in development since it emphasises the importance of
two-way horizontal communication and need to facilitate the
participation of stakeholders in each step for empowerment. ‘Change is
now expected to be defined with the people and not for the people,
making communication for social change closely aligned with the
participatory communication perspective’ (World Bank).
This model favours people’s
active and direct interaction through consultation and dialogue. It
shifts the emphasis from information dissemination to situation
analysis, from persuasion to participation.
Participatory approaches are
gaining worldwide importance in development programmes because they
offer enough opportunities to any individual right from passive
recipients to active agents of development efforts. Participatory Rural
Appraisal (PRA) and Participatory Action Research (PAR) are the two main
approaches of development communication. PRA facilitates people’s
involvement in the problem analysis process, while PAR aims at placing
communities and local stakeholders in the driving seat of development
efforts. Till such time as we do not include communication in a
systematic and dialogic manner, any approach of communication will not
be successful in the large scale. Participatory development
communi-cation or the horizontal model of communication opens up new
space for dialogue among stakeholders and facilitates the exchange of
knowledge, empowering people to participate actively in the process
affecting their own lives.
In the participatory approach,
engagement of stakeholders is essential for assessing risks, identifying
opportunities, preventing problems and identifying the needed change.
This is the model communication to asses and to empower are its key
focal points. In this model, the media is no longer the central element
of communication. It can be used as one of the tools to be used
according to the situation. The SMCR model has given way to the two-way
model which is more appreciated, where the sender is at the same time
the receiver and vice verse. The combination of these elements in
emerging development paradigm is shifting its focus from media to
people, and from persuasion to participation.
q