Sustainable Livelihoods and Micro
Enterprises
Achla Savyasaachi
With almost 80 per cent of the Indian
population fighting for survival everyday, it is of utmost
importance to identify new ways and means to provide resources they
need to better their lives. Grant or subsidies are far too small in
macro-economic terms to do much in the face of the vastness of the
problem. There is a need to identify ways to encourage survivors
rather than creating helpless dependents. This necessitates a
basic change in the mindset of both givers and takers.
One
sustainable way of dealing with the situation is to create
sustainable livelihoods. Government agencies and the formal sector
clearly cannot absorb the entire workforce. In this scenario,
there is a need to promote entrepreneurship in the informal sector.
In 1993, a United Nations Development
Programme workshop took place in Delhi, in collaboration with the
World Business Council for Sustainable Development on Micro and
Small Enterprises and Eco-friendly Technology. At this workshop,
World Business Council for Sustainable Development, International
Development Research Centre, Canada and Development Alternatives,
New Delhi spelt out and demonstrated the micro/small enterprises
and sustainable development linkages based on experiences of FUNDES,
an institution to promote micro enterprises based in Latin America,
and TARA - the micro enterprises arm of Development Alternatives.
The workshop recommended that steps be taken to create an
institutional mechanism in India to provide finances and support
services to technology-based micro/small enterprises for promoting
sustainable livelihoods and providing income-generating
opportunities.
Any enterprise, whether in the formal or
informal sector, needs financial resources for working capital and
investment purposes. As far as the formal sector is concerned, it
is well serviced by various commercial banks and other financial
institutions.
Informal units operate under conditions
of extreme shortage of all types of resources. These include a poor
endowment of fixed capital and working capital. The qualitative and
quantitative limitations in terms of having access to outdated
technologies, lead to a low level of productivity and extremely
high cost. The low level of working capital will force small
producers to buy inputs in small quantity. This will result in
considerable loss of time, interruption and lack of continuity in
production processes. The shortage of funds also makes it difficult
to even keep minimum inventories and explore more favourable market
options.
During the year 1997-98, out of the
total net bank credit of Rs 2,18,219 crores by public sector banks,
only 18 per cent i.e. Rs 38,109 crores has been disbursed to the
small scale sector. The tiny sector has been given Rs 9,515 crores
out of Rs 38,109 crores. It clearly indicates that the various
credit institutions which are working to channel credit to help
people establish small or micro enterprises including national
development banks, commercial banks, rural banks and co-operative
banks allocate a very small portion of their portfolio for the
informal sector. Nationalised banks and formal credit institutions
are not attuned to deal with this section of the society requiring
small loans and having no collateral security to offer. The
cultural gap between the institutions and the community that needs
to be bridged is wide. These institutions are more accustomed to
dealing with the more confident, literate borrower of urban areas.
Credit is a powerful development tool.
Institutional credit can make it possible
a) to finance simple technological
improvements and consequently attain greater productivity, and
b) to provide the necessary working
capital to improve quality, timely availability and cost of inputs
as well as to find market opportunities.
But like any tool, its effectiveness
depends on how it is used. Any credit programme must be designed
keeping in mind the needs, aspirations, skills and the social,
economic, cultural and political system of the population to be
served. The most important element of any credit institution to
work with the informal sector, is to demonstrate that the credit to
the informal sector is financially viable.
Formal financial institutions cover
their credit risks and profit from a mix in their loan portfolio.
Adding small producers to the portfolio would increase the credit
risk. Further, it generally costs more to administer a portfolio
split up into very small loans than a theme involving only a few
large customers. Traditional banking practice tends to give much
weight to a portfolio involving large customers who can provide
guarantees when considering an application for credit but sufficient
attention is not always paid to the analysis of factors affecting
the risk of default i.e. lack of non-financial support services.
This has a number of important
implications. Formal financial institutions prefer to finance a
customer with sufficient assets that can be pledged as security.
Secondly, these institutions consider recovery of their portfolio as
the only major factor to be taken into account. They are not
determining the composition of the portfolio according to the needs
of the financial resources of the informal sector. They also have a
very high operating cost.
In this scenario, credit though
important, cannot by itself resolve all of the structural and
functional problems. Credit is a condition that is necessary
though it is not sufficient for the development and transformation
of small-scale informal production.
Small producers, who traditionally have
no access to institutional credit, have greater needs for training
and technical assistance as well. Therefore, it is becoming
increasingly important for the lending agency to work in association
with, or in coordination with, promotional agencies specialising
in training and technical assistance for informal activities.
At the same time, it is important to
find ways to make the financial operations attractive and profitable
in funding small scale operations to attract the inflow of funds
in the lending agency. To be able to meet the credit needs of a
small, informal unit, financial intermediaries have to reduce the
relatively high operating costs, increase revenue, reduce risks and
undertake organisational adaptation.
It is of utmost importance, therefore,
to have an efficient and competent promotion agency with experience
or capability of quickly adapting to the circumstances. It also
requires a financial intermediary that agrees to adjust
requirements, criteria and procedures, without sacrificing financial
viability.
One of the most significant global
changes in the 1990s is the increasing use of public-private
partnership approaches to finance infrastructure development and in
other areas with the assumption that the benefits of such
partnerships would trickle down in the system and would create
better living conditions.
The 1993 UNDP Workshop emphasised the
need to create an institutional mechanism at a micro level which
should be flexible, low in cost and simple in procedure for
providing finances and rendering support services at close proximity
to the borrower.
As a result of the efforts for promoting
an innovative mechanism for providing finance and support services
to Micro Small Entrepreneurs (MSEs), two corporate entities have
been recently established in India. Indian Micro Enterprises
Development Foundation (IMEDF), incorporated in 1996 under Section
25 of the Companies Act, 1956 as a not-for-profit organisation, and
Indian Micro Enterprises Development Finance Corporation Limited (IMEDFIN)
incorporated in 1997 as a for-profit entity.
The Foundation will help in creating an
enabling environment for micro and small enterprises. The
Foundation will provide support services to Micro Small
Entrepreneurs (MSEs) and Micro Credit Finance Institutions in the
NGO Sector; and the Finance Corporation will provide credit to the
MSE sector using innovative financial instrumentalities (including
venture capital financing).
The working of the Foundation and the
Corporation together is an initiative towards developing a model of
an innovative mechanism in India to cater to that class of people
who are otherwise excluded from the formal credit system because of
their lack of material collateral. The joint effort will also
provide support service input to promote sustainable enterprises.
The financial package offered by the
Finance Corporation has features such as close proximity, quick and
uncomplicated disbursement of credit, credit sanctioning on the
basis of actual requirements, suitable credit duration and repayment
modalities and credit disbursement to be linked with non-financial
support services.
"One of the
most significant global changes
in the 1990s is the increasing use of
public-private partnership approaches to finance
infrastructure development and finally create better
living conditions "
In the formal sector, two common sources
of failure of development financial intermediaries are imperfect
information and imperfect enforcement. The Foundation and the
Corporation have plans to tackle this gap in a strategic way by
setting up an information centre to have a strong database.
For the purpose of the Corporation and
the Foundation, micro and small enterprises have been defined to
include those enterprises which have a total investment in plant and
equipment ranging from Rs 10,000 to Rs 10 lakhs and from Rs 10 lakhs
to Rs 1 crore, respectively and whose operations/outputs are
eco-friendly and technology-based with inputs of market-driven
indigenous or imported technology.
The geographic target initially will be
the Delhi National Capital Region, followed by the Bombay-Pune
region. The following sectors will be targeted initially :
q |
Ancillary industry related to
engineering, automotive, food processing and pharmaceutical
sectors |
q |
Information technology (hardware,
software and services) |
q |
Service sector |
q |
Location - specific industries such
as the glass industry in Firozabad, pottery industry in Khurja,
leather industry in Agra and brass industry in Moradabad |
q |
Distribution industry
|
The Foundation will provide support
service in the following areas : |
q |
Market/feasibility, studies |
q |
Technology acquisition |
q |
Marketing |
q |
Skill development |
q |
Identification of supplier |
q |
Facilitating access to information |
q |
Credit rating of micro and small
enterprises |
q |
Catalysing horizontal and vertical
linkages of MSEs with big business, finance institutions, and
integration with global markets. |
The Foundation will also provide support
services to Micro Credit Finance Institutions (MCFIS) through
strategic alliances with appropriate private and public sector
agencies and NGOs, and engage itself in capacity and skill
development of MCFIS to enhance their capabilities for adequate and
sustainable supply of micro and small enterprises. Support services
to MCFIS would be as follows:
q |
Innovations in micro credit finance
technologies, systems, and infrastructure support |
q |
Development methodologies and
systems for monitoring flow and end-use of funds of micro credit
finance institutions |
q |
Designing performance criteria for
micro credit finance institutions. |
q |
Development methodologies for credit
rating of micro credit finance institutions |
q |
Facilitate replication of best
practices and innovative financial technologies by developing
borrower-friendly process documentation |
The
strategies adopted by the Finance Corporation and the Foundation to
ensure regular flow of funds, on a sustainable basis, focus upon
strengthening a new business relationship between the private sector
and the informal financial intermediaries, by providing viable
investment opportunities in a huge untapped market.
q
The reporter is a marketing engineer
at Development Alternatives.
Back to Contents
|