PEOPLE’S CHARTER
We, the People, and Gandhi
50th Anniversary of Gandhi’s Martyrdom
The
constituent assembly adopted a constitution by which it assigned all
resources of the people to the union and state governments,
authorised them to take all decisions without accountability, keep
the people in the dark, create an overbearing state bureaucracy to
rule over them and make local governance which is pivotal in
democracies, weak and ineffective. This is no democracy. Based on
exploitative colonial institutions, it looks more like colonial
self-rule!
Influenced by the
perceived success of Soviet centralised socialism, the leaders
adopted Soviet type centralised planning and a controlled economy.
They, thus, created a mixed economy in a mixed-up polity.
Right from the beginning, it failed to tackle basic social issues.
It fostered lack of political accountability and ever increasing
overheads, misuse and wastage of resources and corruption.
Clearly, the
constituent assembly was to function as a trustee of the people. By
adopting such a constitution and authenticating it in the name of
“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA,” it unwittingly abused the trust
reposed in it. The legal and ethical legitimacy of the
constitution which makes the representatives the masters and the
people their subjects, is thus questionable. Such an anti-people
constitution based on exploitative colonial institutions, is a fraud
on the nation and its people. Gandhi and all those who gave their
lives for freedom were betrayed.
Gandhi advocated
a democracy in which power flows upwards from the people. It
provides for exclusive jurisdictions (interestingly, with
presidential system) at local, state and national levels.
It has been documented in Prof Shriman Narayan Agarwal’s
book “Gandhian Constitution for Free India” with an acceptance
foreword by Gandhi (Kitabistan, Allahabad,1946). It has great
similarity with the best democracies of the world, notably the
Swiss. Gandhi added some powerful features for containing
consumption and promoting social justice and equity.
Gandhi was the
conscience-keeper of the nation. As power came close, the political
system distanced him from the decision-making processes. Rejection
of Gandhi’s democracy resulted in rejection of all that he stood
for. The leaders now give only lip service to his teachings. Very
few know about the above-mentioned book.
Gandhi was
talking of sustainability when no one was. Had the Indian
leadership followed him, India could have influenced the entire
world. The damage caused is thus colossal.
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA THAT IS
BHARAT,
condemn all colonial institutions, practices and attitudes as they
demean the nation and its people. We demand that the commission
being set up for constitutional reforms should draft a constitution
based on the book “Gandhian Constitution for Free India”, make
improvements if necessary, and get it authenticated by the sovereign
people through referendum.
Impact of Gandhian Democracy
Gandhian
democracy, by clearly defining roles at each level with
accountability to the people through effective transparency,
promotes responsible politics discouraging self-seekers and
criminals. It increases the political power and presence of all the
people at all levels and reduces the bureaucratic stranglehold. It
drastically reduces overheads, misuse and wastage of resources and
corruption.
Management of
land, police and forests with local accountability improves
planning, land distribution and use, law and order and sustainable
resource use. Departmental heads, appointed on contract (approved
and terminable) by the elected body, are accountable to the people.
Local empowerment facilitates education, stabilisation of
population, social well being, care of the environment and communal
harmony.
Rejection of
Gandhian democracy resulted in rejection of all that Gandhi stood
for. Centralisation fostered colonial attitudes, suppressed our
ethos and values and divided communities. Gandhian democracy alone
can revitalise our society, regenerate our values and develop the
full potential of the people through local empowerment.
Gandhi was totally opposed to the partition of India. The
leaders accepted partition. Many people held Gandhi responsible for
it when he was not. Gandhian democracy will bring prosperity with
equity and pave the way for making South Asia a confederation of
peace loving nations.
Strategies for Reforms
Contemporary democracy needs an independent constitutional authority
- the “Sovereign Rights Commission” - at the union and state levels,
to oversee the sovereign rights of the people to information,
consultation, participation and
referendum, issue
guidelines and enforce their adherence. It will institute reforms
approved by the people through referendum, suitably phase them and
monitor their effective implementation.
Shri PA Sangma,
then Speaker Lok Sabha, circulated our document in the golden
jubilee special session of the parliament last year. He observed,
“the study calls for truly autonomous democratic institutions
upwards from the villages and creation of sovereign rights
commissions to bring about changes through the pro-active
initiatives of the citizens”. The political system ignored the
document.
Justice MN
Venkatachaliah, Former Chief Justice of India, has observed that
referendum is the supreme sovereign right of the people intrinsic to
democracies and exists even if not specifically provided for in
the constitution. He praises the concept of sovereign rights
commission as providing a legitimate, non-violent process for
transforming our society.
Having acquired
centralised exploitative colonial power, the political system is
likely to oppose democratic reforms. The people should appeal to the
senior well-intentioned leadership. They should also explore
possibilities of judicial intervention. They can challenge the
legal and ethical legitimacy of the anti-people constitution adopted
by the constituent assembly in the name of the people violating the
trust reposed in it.
The people can
also pray for a writ on authorising the commission being set up to
direct referendum or directing referendum on thus authorising the
commission. Various strategies, to get rid of demeaning colonial
institutions and irresponsible governance they foster, need to be
investigated.
Prepared by a group consisting primarily of Sunil Shastri,
Chairman, Lal Bahadur Shastri Memorial Foundation, Dr BB Dutta,
Member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha), Ashok Khosla,
People First; Anoop Chaudhari, Former Advocate General,
Madhya Pradesh, Anil Laul, Architect-Planner; Vichitra
Sharma, Media Consultant, and coordinated by SK Sharma,
People First.
Visit our web
site:
http://www.ecouncil.ac.cr/devalt/peoplef.htm
q
Back to Contents
|