Small Steps, Big Achievements:
Eco Habitat Delivery System
R ight
to shelter is a fundamental human right and housing is a basic
requirements for human survival. The Governments, both at the central
and the state levels, have recognised this. ‘Shelter for all’ finds its
place even in India’s vision 2020. While on the one hand, rapid increase
in population and cost of construction is widening the gap between the
rich and the poor, on the other hand, rising aspirations are pushing
rural communities to opt for energy intensive and ecologically damaging
building materials. Though one should keep in mind environmental
concerns such as natural resource degradation, environmental pollution,
climate change etc, the challenge at present also involves providing
adequate and safe housing for people without access to housing. It is
observed that rural poor are neither aware of various housing schemes
nor is there a transparent public process to address this issue. Also,
due to the fact that most of the rural families find it difficult to
invest money for construction of house, the credit mechanism (which
enables the disadvantaged rural families to accesses adequate and safe
housing) has become one of the most important components of the habitat
delivery model.

Figure 1.1: Need for Eco House Delivery Model
Thus, housing delivery models
are required that facilitate "processes for sustainable habitat
development" in villages of India. These processes need to address
concerns of energy and resource efficiency in construction; delivery
mechanisms that support and enhance local skills and economies; and
development of durable and safe habitat in response to local climate and
geomorphological conditions. This is being addressed by Development
Alternatives through FEM 1
project which is funded by FEM Italia Onlus.

Figure 1.2: Key action areas
of Habitat Delivery Model for FEM
Need for FEM
In India, only a small
percentage of rural housing is financed by grant-based government social
housing schemes. Most housing is constructed incrementally by families
themselves in an informal manner. Observation shows that government
housing schemes and projects have had a poor record in improving habitat
quality in long term despite the potential for comprehensive influence.
A majority of rural poor still suffer on account of inadequate housing,
lack of infrastructure and poor access to knowledge, material and
financial resources. There is a significant lack of institutional
finance for rural housing. Though the institutional infrastructure,
particularly the banking sector, has acquired a reasonable depth in the
rural areas, they continue to be hesitant in extending housing loans to
the rural borrowers on account of various constraints and challenges
associated with rural lending. Further, in the absence of necessary
flexibility in application of prudential norms, the lending agencies
tend to keep away from such lending. As a result, the availability of
institutional credit for rural housing and its accessibility by the
rural population continue to be serious challenges and most of the time
these people depend on loans/credit from sahukaar or mahajan
at high interest rates, adding further to their impoverishment.
As a reaction to this, the main
focus of DA’s Rural Habitat programme is to provide support to delivery
of cost effective and energy efficient building products and services
for rural communities through micro-entrepreneurs and artisans. The
programme facilitates demand creation for their products and services
through social marketing, government schemes and credit linkage or micro
financing.
Eco Habitat Delivery Model
The project called the ‘Micro
entrepreneurial models and services for the socio-economical development
of working poor in India’2,
supported by FEM, is an action research project and a part of larger
Rural Habitat Programme of DA and is designed to set in place a
comprehensive model for housing and habitat delivery for rural families
in selected regions of Bundelkhand with the aim of filling the following
gaps:
•
The unavailability of
bridging funds for eco construction that can provide incentives to the
rural poor to adopt environment friendly materials
•
Inadequate
demonstration of eco friendly technology options in the villages
•
Lack of securitisation
of micro-loans for the poor that can help catalyse demand for eco
construction.
The central aim of the
initiative is to facilitate the implementation of a sustainable habitat
delivery model for the rural community, in the socio-economic context of
Bundelkhand.
In the first phase the primary
objective of the project was to set in place a delivery and financing
model which enables the rural families to access durable shelter and
adequate sanitation.
Project Deliverables for the
three year project include 100 eco houses, 200 eco toilets,
establishment of two enterprises related to eco building material
production, and capacity building of 30 building artisans and four
supervisors.
Eco technologies being used in
the project are rat-trap bond for brick masonry, precast door window
frames, micro concrete roofing (MCR) tiles for verandah and toilets, and
stone patti roofing for room and kitchen.
Financial model
The estimated cost of the eco
house construction in this project is Rs 60,000. Half the amount would
comprise of bank loan and half will be the contribution from the clients
or families in the form of material and labour. In case of construction
of eco toilets, the estimated cost is Rs 8500 out of which Rs 2200 will
be leveraged from a government scheme, namely the Total Sanitation
Scheme, Rs 5500 will be the bank loan component and Rs 800 will be the
clients’ contribution.
Key outcomes
•
Clear understanding of
the processes involved and the strategies to be adopted in bank linkage
for access to loans
•
Favourable financial
delivery model for the beneficiary finalised with the bank
•
Promotion of
eco-friendly building materials and technology
•
Good working
relationship with Government of Madhya Pradesh which may help in
developing a housing scheme, which can converge with this financial
model in an effective way
•
Leveraging with
government schemes such as Mukhya Mantri Gram Awas Yojana and Total
Sanitation Scheme for eco house and toilet construction q
Amol Mangrulkar
amangrulkar@devalt.org
References
1. Jain.D & Niazi. Z (2005), ‘Participatory rural Habitat
Processes-Emerging Trends’, Development Alternatives, New Delhi.
2. Niazi, Z et.al (2007), ‘ The National Rural Housing and Habitat
Policy 2007-A proposal to Government of India’, Development
Alternatives, New Delhi.
3. Ministry of Rural Development, (2011), ‘ Report of the Committee to
formulate concrete Bankable Schemes for Rural Housing’, Government of
India, New Delhi.
4. Niazi. Z et.al, (2010-11), ‘FEM-Monthly and quarterly narrative
reports’, Development Alternatives, New Delhi.
Endnote
1 Associazione FEM Italia Onlus, with their registered office at Corso
Matteotti, 23, 25122 Bre
scia, Italy was established in 2006 by group of people and Italian
organisations with pluriannual experience in the realisation of
innovative projects of economic cooperation in the LDCs, mainly in the
fields of fair trade, micro-credit and, development of services to
support micro-enterprises.
2 While the initiative planned with support from FEM is for three years,
it is being implemented in three phases of one year each. The first
phase (from May 1, 2010 to April 30, 2011) has been already completed.
Currently the second phase (May 2011 to April 2012) of the project is
running.
Back to Contents |